PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G35 vs Helio G25 – what's better? Helio G35 vs Helio G25

VS

Helio G35 Helio G25
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G35 (with PowerVR GE8320 graphics) and Helio G25 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (2)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Helio G35
12 Helio G25
10 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Helio G35
4 Helio G25
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Helio G35
76 Helio G25
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Helio G35
22 Helio G25
21 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 10 score – 144K vs 125K
- Higher GPU frequency (~5%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Helio G35
vs Helio G25
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Helio G35
+15% 144387 Helio G25
125125 | CPU | 52240 | 50728 |
| GPU | 19256 | 16844 |
| Memory | 40204 | 28611 |
| UX | 32687 | 28942 |
| Total score | 144387 | 125125 |
| Samples | [31 tests] | [13 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Helio G35
+2% 189 Helio G25
185 Multi-Core Score Helio G35
+55% 810 Helio G25
521 | Asset compression | 63.1 MB/sec | - |
| HTML 5 Browser | 25.9 pages/sec | - |
| PDF Renderer | 36.1 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Image detection | 10.5 images/sec | - |
| HDR | 30 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Background blur | 0.87 images/sec | - |
| Photo processing | 7.57 images/sec | - |
| Ray tracing | 1.65 Mpixels/sec | - |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 23 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 29 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 30 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 43 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 29 FPS [Low] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco C3 720 x 1600 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio G35 and Helio G25
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 2.2 W | 2 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4 | 4 |
| Shading units | 8 | 8 |
| Total shaders | 32 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 43.5 Gigaflops | 41.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 1.2 | 1.2 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | No |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.9 Gb/s | 13.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 21MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 | - H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | June 2020 | June 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | MT6765G | MT6762G |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G35 official site | MediaTek Helio G25 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Helio G35
1105 (79.3%) Helio G25
288 (20.7%) Vote Total votes:
1393 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G85
2. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G36
3. MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc T606 (5)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G25 and Helio G35, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Johan February 27, 2023 at 10:11 PM These are both slower processors for phones like rugged phones where money is spent on other areas of the phone like case, screen, waterproof, and camera. Well worth getting the G35 in this respect if you can. +12 Reply
Bri January 11, 2022 at 08:51 AM The lack of NFC, well, does not cut it. +10 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >