SmartphonesCompare LaptopsCompare CPUGPUSoC Ranking
Beta Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G85 vs Helio G35 – what's better? Helio G85 vs Helio G35
VS
Helio G85 Helio G35
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G85 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Helio G35 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Helio G85
18 Helio G35
12 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Helio G85
7 Helio G35
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Helio G85
76 Helio G35
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Helio G85
25 Helio G35
22 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G85
- Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 82%) AnTuTu 10 score – 265K vs 145K
- Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
Promotion
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Helio G85
vs Helio G35
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Helio G85
+82% 265219 Helio G35
145990 | CPU | 85473 | 54934 |
| GPU | 39924 | 17881 |
| Memory | 64027 | 40532 |
| UX | 75795 | 32643 |
| Total score | 265219 | 145990 |
| Samples | [101 tests] | [21 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Helio G85
+119% 413 Helio G35
189 Multi-Core Score Helio G85
+64% 1332 Helio G35
810 | Asset compression | 75.3 MB/sec | 63.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 38.2 pages/sec | 25.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 44.5 Mpixels/sec | 36.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 23.5 images/sec | 10.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 43.3 Mpixels/sec | 30 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.05 images/sec | 0.87 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 12.2 images/sec | 7.57 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.75 Mpixels/sec | 1.65 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Helio G85
1138 Helio G35
n/a Promotion
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Helio G85
743 Helio G35
n/a | Graphics test | 4 FPS | - |
| Score | 743 | - |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 45 FPS [High] | 23 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 40 FPS [Medium] | 29 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 21 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 49 FPS [Low] | 30 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 51 FPS [Medium] | 43 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 46 FPS [Ultra] | 29 FPS [Low] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1080 x 2340 | Xiaomi Poco C3 720 x 1600 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio G85 and Helio G35
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 2.2 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 4 |
| Shading units | 24 | 8 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 96 Gigaflops | 43.5 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | No |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 13.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture | 2K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 2K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | April 2020 | June 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | MT6769Z | MT6765G |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G85 official site | MediaTek Helio G35 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Helio G85
1169 (86%) Helio G35
190 (14%) Vote Total votes:
1359 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G36
2. MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc T606
3. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc T606
4. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
5. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6. MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G99
Compare other chipsets (170+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G35 and Helio G85, or ask any questions Name Message Send Send Promotion Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >