PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G85 vs Helio G70 – what's better? Helio G85 vs Helio G70
VS
Helio G85 Helio G70
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G85 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Helio G70 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (4)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Helio G85
18 Helio G70
18 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Helio G85
7 Helio G70
7 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Helio G85
76 Helio G70
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Helio G85
25 Helio G70
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G85
- Higher GPU frequency (~22%)
- Performs 22% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 10 score – 262K vs 246K
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Helio G85
vs Helio G70
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Helio G85
+7% 262804 Helio G70
246700 | CPU | 72399 | 78346 |
| GPU | 41899 | 41559 |
| Memory | 70163 | 55019 |
| UX | 78343 | 71776 |
| Total score | 262804 | 246700 |
| Samples | [179 tests] | [4 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Helio G85
413 Helio G70
+1% 417 Multi-Core Score Helio G85
1332 Helio G70
+1% 1345 | Asset compression | 75.3 MB/sec | 69.5 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 38.2 pages/sec | 38.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 44.5 Mpixels/sec | 48.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 23.5 images/sec | 24.8 images/sec |
| HDR | 43.3 Mpixels/sec | 44.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.05 images/sec | 3.2 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 12.2 images/sec | 12.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.75 Mpixels/sec | 2.1 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Helio G85
+20% 1138 Helio G70
949 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Helio G85
+3% 743 Helio G70
718 | Stability | - | 99% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 743 | 718 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 45 FPS [High] | 31 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 40 FPS [Medium] | 30 FPS [Low] |
| Fortnite | 21 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 49 FPS [Low] | 52 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 51 FPS [Medium] | 52 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 46 FPS [Ultra] | 53 FPS [High] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1080 x 2340 | Realme C3 720 x 1600 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio G85 and Helio G70
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | - | 320 KB |
| L3 cache | - | 1 MB |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 5.5 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 820 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 96 Gigaflops | 78.7 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.41 Gb/s | 13.41 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | April 2020 | January 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6769Z | MT6769V/CB |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G85 official site | MediaTek Helio G70 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Helio G85
1277 (46.1%) Helio G70
1494 (53.9%) Vote Total votes:
2771 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G99
2. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc T606 (8)
3. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (10)
4. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (4)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G70 and Helio G85, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
Fahad Ahmed March 16, 2021 at 03:59 PM As both are almost same in performance but G70 is cheaper, So I'll suggest G70. +116 Reply Emil May 11, 2021 at 01:41 AM They are not "almost same in performance" - the benchmark numbers are messed up, and make no sense, but the frame rates for the demanding games seem legit - 43 fps vs 31 fps for PUBG tells you everything you need to know about the performance difference. +74 Reply Randhawa May 17, 2021 at 08:23 PM Emil, Check the benchmark numbers then you’ll be able to see the results and would be able to choose which one is better for you............... +46 Reply Imtiaz October 1, 2021 at 09:45 PM Emil, The devices used to test also matters...i think note 9 is supposed to do a little bit better than c3 regarding the higher budget thus having higher capabilities at least even a bit discluding only raw chipset performance...(mostly available base variant of c3 is 3/32 while the note 9 is 4/64 on the other hand) +17 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >