PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G95 vs Helio G85 – what's better? Helio G95 vs Helio G85
VS
Helio G95 Helio G85
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Helio G85 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Helio G95
25 Helio G85
18 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Helio G95
14 Helio G85
7 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Helio G95
76 Helio G85
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Helio G95
31 Helio G85
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
- Performs 80% better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 56%) AnTuTu 10 score – 409K vs 262K
- Supports 28% higher memory bandwidth (17.1 against 13.41 GB/s)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G85
- Higher GPU frequency (~11%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Helio G95
vs Helio G85
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Helio G95
+56% 409383 Helio G85
262804 | CPU | 125729 | 72399 |
| GPU | 104829 | 41899 |
| Memory | 75811 | 70163 |
| UX | 103014 | 78343 |
| Total score | 409383 | 262804 |
| Samples | [140 tests] | [179 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Helio G95
+54% 636 Helio G85
413 Multi-Core Score Helio G95
+30% 1738 Helio G85
1332 | Asset compression | 93.5 MB/sec | 75.3 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 46 pages/sec | 38.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 58.3 Mpixels/sec | 44.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 34.5 images/sec | 23.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 55.2 Mpixels/sec | 43.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 4.91 images/sec | 3.05 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 14.5 images/sec | 12.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.47 Mpixels/sec | 1.75 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Helio G95
+71% 1949 Helio G85
1138 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Helio G95
+99% 1482 Helio G85
743 | Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 1482 | 743 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 51 FPS [Low] | 45 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 FPS [Ultra] | 40 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] | 21 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 57 FPS [Low] | 49 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 48 FPS [High] | 51 FPS [Medium] |
| Genshin Impact | 27 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 52 FPS [Ultra] | 46 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Realme 7 1080 x 2400 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Helio G85
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2050 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4 | 2 |
| Shading units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 96 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 172.8 Gigaflops | 96 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU | Yes |
| NPU theoretical performance | 1 TOPS | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 Gb/s | 13.41 Gb/s |
| Max size | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | September 2020 | April 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Low end |
| Model number | MT6785V/CD | MT6769Z |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G95 official site | MediaTek Helio G85 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Helio G95
1594 (80.3%) Helio G85
390 (19.7%) Vote Total votes:
1984 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (62)
2. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2)
3. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (1)
4. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (1)
5. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (10)
6. MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G99
7. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc T606 (8)
8. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (5)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G85 and Helio G95, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >