PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G95 vs Helio G90 – what's better? Helio G95 vs Helio G90
VS
Helio G95 Helio G90
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Helio G90 (Mali-G76 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Helio G95
25 Helio G90
23 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Helio G95
14 Helio G90
12 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Helio G95
76 Helio G90
75 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Helio G95
31 Helio G90
30 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
- Higher GPU frequency (~25%)
- Performs 25% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 10 score – 409K vs 368K
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Helio G95
vs Helio G90
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Helio G95
+11% 409383 Helio G90
368990 | CPU | 125729 | 120779 |
| GPU | 104829 | 78652 |
| Memory | 75811 | 72733 |
| UX | 103014 | 96826 |
| Total score | 409383 | 368990 |
| Samples | [140 tests] | Less than 3 |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Helio G95
+2% 636 Helio G90
625 Multi-Core Score Helio G95
1738 Helio G90
1744 | Asset compression | 93.5 MB/sec | 91.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 46 pages/sec | 47.1 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 58.3 Mpixels/sec | 66.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 34.5 images/sec | 32.4 images/sec |
| HDR | 55.2 Mpixels/sec | 50.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 4.91 images/sec | 4.55 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 14.5 images/sec | 17.1 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.47 Mpixels/sec | 2.74 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Helio G95
+4% 1949 Helio G90
1880 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Helio G95
1482 Helio G90
+2% 1505 | Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Score | 1482 | 1505 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 51 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 57 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 48 FPS [High] | - |
| Genshin Impact | 27 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 52 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Device | Realme 7 1080 x 2400 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Helio G90
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2050 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP4 | Mali-G76 MP4 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4 | 4 |
| Shading units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 96 | 96 |
| FLOPS | 172.8 Gigaflops | 138.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU | MediTek APU 2.0 |
| NPU theoretical performance | 1 TOPS | 1 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 Gb/s | - |
| Max size | 10 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | September 2020 | July 2019 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6785V/CD | MT6785V/CD |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G95 official site | MediaTek Helio G90 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Helio G95
460 (80.6%) Helio G90
111 (19.4%) Vote Total votes:
571 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (61)
2. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (1)
3. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (1)
4. MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G90 and Helio G95, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >