Hibernate & H2 Vs Hibernate & HSQLDB Embedded
Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.
Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)
Transaction Size => | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 4.6 | 32.6 | 3.0 | 13.1 | 3.8 | 22.9 |
Element Collection Test | 3.7 | 15.1 | 1.1 | 8.2 | 2.4 | 11.7 |
Inheritance Test | 6.7 | 25.5 | 3.1 | 13.6 | 4.9 | 19.5 |
Indexing Test | 8.2 | 29.6 | 4.2 | 18.8 | 6.2 | 24.2 |
Graph (Binary Tree) Test | 3.4 | 13.8 | 3.9 | 15.6 | 3.7 | 14.7 |
Multithreading Test | 6.8 | 37.4 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 5.9 | 25.2 |
All Tests | 5.6 | 25.6 | 3.4 | 13.7 | 4.5 | 19.7 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (4.5) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (19.7) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 4.4 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A large performance gap has been detected when using JPA element collections with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (1.1) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (8.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 7.5 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)
Retrieval Size => | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 3.1 | 24.8 | 6.0 | 16.4 | 4.6 | 20.6 |
Element Collection Test | 1.0 | 11.3 | 1.1 | 10.8 | 1.0 | 11.0 |
Inheritance Test | 2.9 | 21.7 | 7.6 | 21.0 | 5.2 | 21.3 |
Indexing Test | 2.6 | 11.9 | 7.0 | 21.5 | 4.8 | 16.7 |
Graph (Binary Tree) Test | 0.42 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 0.78 | 4.1 |
Multithreading Test | 6.5 | 19.8 | 10.5 | 21.5 | 8.5 | 20.6 |
All Tests | 2.8 | 15.5 | 5.6 | 16.0 | 4.2 | 15.7 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (4.2) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (15.7) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.7 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A huge performance gap has been detected when using JPA element collections with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (1.0) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (11.3) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 11.3 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)
Retrieval Size => | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 3.7 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
Element Collection Test | 3.7 | 3.4 | 0.63 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.6 |
Inheritance Test | 3.2 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
Indexing Test | 1.7 | 9.9 | 5.8 | 21.7 | 3.8 | 15.8 |
Multithreading Test | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 1.0 | 0.82 |
All Tests | 2.7 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 5.2 | 2.3 | 4.7 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in executing the tested JPA queries. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (2.3) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (4.7) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 2.0 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A large performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (1.7) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (9.9) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 5.8 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)
Transaction Size => | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 2.9 | 14.2 | 1.8 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 9.6 |
Element Collection Test | 2.6 | 10.1 | 1.1 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 7.8 |
Inheritance Test | 3.2 | 13.4 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 10.5 |
Indexing Test | 2.9 | 10.7 | 2.7 | 6.1 | 2.8 | 8.4 |
Graph (Binary Tree) Test | 1.2 | 3.7 | 0.43 | 2.5 | 0.79 | 3.1 |
Multithreading Test | 5.6 | 23.9 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 13.9 |
All Tests | 3.1 | 12.7 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 8.9 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (2.5) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (8.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.6 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A large performance gap has been detected when using graphs of objects with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (0.43) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (2.5) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 5.8 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)
Transaction Size => | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 3.8 | 26.1 | 2.4 | 17.5 | 3.1 | 21.8 |
Element Collection Test | 1.9 | 9.1 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 7.1 |
Inheritance Test | 3.7 | 21.4 | 2.5 | 17.7 | 3.1 | 19.6 |
Indexing Test | 7.6 | 33.0 | 3.1 | 16.3 | 5.3 | 24.7 |
Graph (Binary Tree) Test | 0.99 | 5.4 | 0.91 | 8.2 | 0.95 | 6.8 |
Multithreading Test | 6.1 | 38.5 | 7.3 | 28.6 | 6.7 | 33.5 |
All Tests | 4.0 | 22.3 | 2.9 | 15.6 | 3.5 | 18.9 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (3.5) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (18.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 5.4 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A large performance gap has been detected when using graphs of objects with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (0.91) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (8.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 9.0 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)
Transaction/Retrieval Size | Few Entities | Many Entities | Average Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded | HibernateH2 server | HibernateHSQLDB embedded |
Basic Person Test | 3.6 | 20.2 | 2.8 | 10.6 | 3.2 | 15.4 |
Element Collection Test | 2.6 | 9.8 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 8.0 |
Inheritance Test | 4.0 | 17.0 | 3.4 | 12.2 | 3.7 | 14.6 |
Indexing Test | 4.6 | 19.0 | 4.5 | 16.9 | 4.6 | 18.0 |
Graph (Binary Tree) Test | 1.5 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 1.6 | 7.2 |
Multithreading Test | 5.2 | 24.1 | 5.2 | 13.5 | 5.2 | 18.8 |
All Tests | 3.7 | 16.5 | 3.2 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 13.9 |
The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with H2 server in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (3.4) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (13.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 4.1 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
A large performance gap has been detected when using JPA element collections with large transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (1.0) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (6.3) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 6.3 times faster than Hibernate with H2 server.
Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons
Hibernate with H2 server against:
- Oracle Database 11g
- IBM DB2 10
- Microsoft SQL Server 2008
- DataNucleus with Derby embedded
- DataNucleus with H2 embedded
- DataNucleus with HSQLDB embedded
- DataNucleus with DB4O embedded
- DataNucleus with Derby server
- DataNucleus with H2 server
- DataNucleus with MySQL server
- DataNucleus with PostgreSQL server
- EclipseLink with Derby embedded
- EclipseLink with H2 embedded
- EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded
- EclipseLink with SQLite embedded
- EclipseLink with Derby server
- EclipseLink with H2 server
- EclipseLink with MySQL server
- EclipseLink with PostgreSQL server
- Hibernate with Derby embedded
- Hibernate with H2 embedded
- Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded
- Hibernate with SQLite embedded
- Hibernate with Derby server
- Hibernate with MySQL server
- Hibernate with PostgreSQL server
- OpenJPA with Derby embedded
- OpenJPA with H2 embedded
- OpenJPA with HSQLDB embedded
- OpenJPA with Derby server
- OpenJPA with H2 server
- OpenJPA with MySQL server
- OpenJPA with PostgreSQL server
- ObjectDB embedded
- ObjectDB server
Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded against:
- Oracle Database 11g
- IBM DB2 10
- Microsoft SQL Server 2008
- DataNucleus with Derby embedded
- DataNucleus with H2 embedded
- DataNucleus with HSQLDB embedded
- DataNucleus with DB4O embedded
- DataNucleus with Derby server
- DataNucleus with H2 server
- DataNucleus with MySQL server
- DataNucleus with PostgreSQL server
- EclipseLink with Derby embedded
- EclipseLink with H2 embedded
- EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded
- EclipseLink with SQLite embedded
- EclipseLink with Derby server
- EclipseLink with H2 server
- EclipseLink with MySQL server
- EclipseLink with PostgreSQL server
- Hibernate with Derby embedded
- Hibernate with H2 embedded
- Hibernate with SQLite embedded
- Hibernate with Derby server
- Hibernate with H2 server
- Hibernate with MySQL server
- Hibernate with PostgreSQL server
- OpenJPA with Derby embedded
- OpenJPA with H2 embedded
- OpenJPA with HSQLDB embedded
- OpenJPA with Derby server
- OpenJPA with H2 server
- OpenJPA with MySQL server
- OpenJPA with PostgreSQL server
- ObjectDB embedded
- ObjectDB server
Từ khóa » H2 Vs Hsqldb
-
Which Is Better H2 Or HSQLDB? [closed] - Stack Overflow
-
System Properties Comparison H2 Vs. HyperSQL - DB-Engines
-
H2 Database Vs HSQLDB | What Are The Differences? - StackShare
-
List Of In-Memory Databases | Baeldung
-
Performance - H2 Database Engine
-
H2 10x Slower Than HSQLDB And 6x Than Apache Derby For Specific ...
-
JOOQ Tuesdays: Thomas Müller Unveils How HSQLDB Evolved Into ...
-
[h2] H2 Vs HSQLDB With Hibernate Comparison
-
Which Is Better H2 Or HSQLDB? [closed] - Codegrepr
-
HSQLDB And H2 Database Comparison - Krybot
-
Spring Boot And H2 In Memory Database - Why, What And How ...
-
HSQLDB
-
[PPT] Embedded Database Benchmark