How To Make A Unicorn Or 'There Never Was An “Acte Clair” In EU Law'

1. Home /
2. Archives /
3. Vol. 17 (2021) /
4. Notes, Comments and Reports

How to Make a Unicorn or ‘There Never was an “Acte Clair” in EU Law’: Some Remarks about Case C-561/19 Consorzio Italian Management

Authors

• Davor Petrić Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-2150

Abstract

In its judgment in Consorzio Italian Management, the Court of Justice has gone some way to solving the riddle that since the beginning of European integration has remained one of the most important and widely discussed doctrines of EU law: one that concerns the obligation of national courts of last instance to refer questions of interpretation of EU law for a preliminary ruling to the Court. The doctrine in question concerns exceptions to this obligation, solidified four decades ago in the landmark CILFIT ruling. More specifically, one exception to the obligation of national courts of last instance to make a reference is found in situations where the meaning of a provision of EU law is clear beyond reasonable doubt. This contribution discusses whether and how the Court’s ruling in Consorzio Italian Management adjusts and recalibrates this particular exception, which despite the name it was usually referred to – ‘acte clair’ – still remains unclear. To explain what, if anything, changes after Consorzio Italian Management, the discussion will go back to the origins of the doctrine of ‘acte clair’, initially pronounced in CILFIT.

Keywords: preliminary ruling procedure, Article 267(3) TFEU, national courts of last instance, obligation to refer, exceptions, CILFIT, ‘acte clair’.

 

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.

 

Suggested citation: D Petrić, ‘How to Make a Unicorn or “There Never Was an ‘Acte Clair’ in EU Law”: Some Remarks about Case C-561/19 Consorzio Italian Management’ (2021) 17 CYELP 307.

Downloads

• Download PDF

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

Petrić, D. (2021). How to Make a Unicorn or ‘There Never was an “Acte Clair” in EU Law’: Some Remarks about Case C-561/19 Consorzio Italian Management. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 17(2021), 307–328. Retrieved from https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/462 More Citation Formats

• ACM
• ACS
• APA
• ABNT
• Chicago
• Harvard
• IEEE
• MLA
• Turabian
• Vancouver

Download Citation

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
• BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 17 (2021)

Section

Notes, Comments and Reports

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Davor Petrić

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

All manuscripts published in CYELP are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy and redistribute their work in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes provided the original work and source are appropriately cited.

For all manuscripts published in CYELP, the copyright remains with the author(s). This means that the author(s) grant the right of first publication to the Yearbook, while retaining the copyright to their manuscripts (accepted for publication or published in CYELP), and may republish these, in full or in part, in other publications, books or materials. However, the following conditions should be met:

- the manuscript is published open access;- when reusing the manuscript, the original source of publication must be properly acknowledged and referenced;- the manuscript remains published by CYELP on its website;- the manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• Davor Petrić, Environmental Justice in the European Union: A Critical Reassessment , Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy: Vol. 15 (2019)
• Nika Bačić Selanec, Davor Petrić, Internal Judicial Independence in the EU and Ghosts from the Socialist Past: Why the Court of Justice Should Not Follow AG Pikamäe in Hann-Invest , Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy: Vol. 20 (2024)
• Nika Bačić Selanec, Davor Petrić, New Frontiers for Article 19(1) TEU: A Comment on Joined Cases C-554/21, C-622/21 and C-727/21 Hann-Invest , Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy: Vol. 20 (2024)
• Davor Petrić, Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law by Joris Larik , Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy: Vol. 12 (2016)

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Click to subscribe to CYELP newsletter!