HTML Colspan In CSS - Stack Overflow

Just browsing Stack Overflow? Help us improve your experience. Sign up for research

1. 1. Home
   2. Questions
   3. Tags
   4. Users
   5. Companies
   6. Labs
   7. Jobs
   8. Discussions
   9. Collectives

   10. Communities for your favorite technologies. Explore all Collectives

2. Teams

   Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams.

   Try Teams for free Explore Teams
3. Teams

4. Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams. Explore Teams

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams

Get early access and see previews of new features.

Learn more about Labs HTML colspan in CSS Ask Question Asked 14 years, 8 months ago Modified 4 years, 2 months ago Viewed 533k times 302

I'm trying to construct a layout similar to the following:

+---+---+---+ | | | | +---+---+---+ | | +-----------+

where the bottom is filling the space of the upper row.

If this were an actual table, I could easily accomplish this with <td colspan="3">, but as I'm simply creating a table-like layout, I cannot use <table> tags. Is this possible using CSS?

• css

Share Improve this question Follow edited Feb 16, 2016 at 9:58 BoltClock 722k165165 gold badges1.4k1.4k silver badges1.4k1.4k bronze badges asked Mar 8, 2010 at 19:15 TowerTower 102k130130 gold badges364364 silver badges516516 bronze badges 8

• 11 The best solution really depends on what is going into the table. If it's data (something that belongs in a table) then use a table. If you are using a table to control the layout of the page, then one of the HTML+CSS solutions below is better. – mwcz Commented Mar 8, 2010 at 19:31
• Add markup for both cases, then show only one at a time using a Media query CSS class. – DigitalDesignDj Commented May 12, 2014 at 23:52
• 2 Forget about CSS. If you display tabular data, you would certainly know on how many columns it would span. Use the colspan attribute – Tihomir Mitkov Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 9:49
• I would do this by bootstrap or customized grid from bootstrap – Arun Prasad E S Commented Jul 15, 2016 at 10:21
• If you're using CSS3, you can use columnSpan. Unlike <td colspan="#">, you don't have the option to set the number of columns, but you can span all columns. w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_column-span.asp – MistyDawn Commented Nov 22, 2017 at 0:00

| Show 3 more comments

16 Answers 16

Sorted by: Reset to default Highest score (default) Trending (recent votes count more) Date modified (newest first) Date created (oldest first) 436

There's no simple, elegant CSS analog for colspan.

Searches on this very issue will return a variety of solutions that include a bevy of alternatives, including absolute positioning, sizing, along with a similar variety of browser- and circumstance-specific caveats. Read, and make the best informed decision you can based on what you find.

Share Improve this answer Follow edited Feb 28, 2017 at 9:30 Quentin 941k132132 gold badges1.3k1.3k silver badges1.4k1.4k bronze badges answered Apr 5, 2010 at 16:19 DavidDavid 4,51211 gold badge1616 silver badges22 bronze badges 14

• 14 Tables are structural elements and just because using colspan changes its appearance does not mean it's not. CSS is used to style elements and not change the structure. The W3C discusses table structure here: w3.org/TR/html401/struct/tables.html#h-11.2 – Rob Commented Apr 5, 2010 at 16:40
• 95 Rob, understand your position, but look in the W3C recommendations - specifically pertaining to the entire table paradigm - and you'll find that part of their consideration was, most certainly, the presentation of tables. This idea that tables were purely conceived as structure is a contemporary fiction I think we'd all be better served to stop spreading. The point is we need to stop being dogmatic about tables. It would be wrong for me to say they're always presentation, and it is just as wrong for you to say they're always structure. Reality is simply not that cut-and-dried. – David Commented Apr 5, 2010 at 17:54
• 4 Looks like your answer is the popular answer. :) I'm happy to learn that the anti-table dogma (which I have bought into) is too strict. I do stand by my answer only insofar as I still think colspan is the right tool for the job. My answer was 75% right, and yours is 100% right. You should come back to SO. – mwcz Commented Jan 17, 2012 at 4:59
• 86 After 2 years, I googled this and wanted to vote up the author but it said "can't vote for your own post" and I realized it was me, lol. I decided to change the accepted solution to this one since I feel it has better information. – Tower Commented Feb 29, 2012 at 13:06
• 15 This is a mini-essay about some other (unspecified) answer, not an answer to the question asked. – Jukka K. Korpela Commented Jun 29, 2014 at 10:31

| Show 9 more comments 63

There is no colspan in css as far as I know, but there will be column-span for multi column layout in the near future, but since it is only a draft in CSS3, you can check it in here. Anyway you can do a workaround using div and span with table-like display like this.

This would be the HTML:

<div class="table"> <div class="row"> <span class="cell red first"></span> <span class="cell blue fill"></span> <span class="cell green last"></span> </div> </div> <div class="table"> <div class="row"> <span class="cell black"></span> </div> </div>

And this would be the css:

/* this is to reproduce table-like structure for the sake of table-less layout. */ .table { display:table; table-layout:fixed; width:100px; } .row { display:table-row; height:10px; } .cell { display:table-cell; } /* this is where the colspan tricks works. */ span { width:100%; } /* below is for visual recognition test purposes only. */ .red { background:red; } .blue { background:blue; } .green { background:green; } .black { background:black; } /* this is the benefit of using table display, it is able to set the width of it's child object to fill the rest of the parent width as in table */ .first { width: 20px; } .last { width: 30px; } .fill { width: 100%; }

The only reason to use this trick is to gain the benefit of table-layout behaviour, I use it alot if only setting div and span width to certain percentage didn't fullfil our design requirement.

But if you don't need to benefit from the table-layout behaviour, then durilai's answer would suit you enough.

Share Improve this answer Follow edited May 23, 2017 at 12:34 CommunityBot 111 silver badge answered Jun 24, 2010 at 10:26 O.OO.O 7,26722 gold badges3636 silver badges3232 bronze badges 4

• 4 Yup, but a little fix: instead of .span { ... it should be span { .... – Slavik Meltser Commented Dec 13, 2012 at 14:12
• 2 Using div tags to display tabular data is as bad as using tables to control page layout – Tihomir Mitkov Commented Mar 11, 2015 at 9:43
• 3 @TichomirMitkov depends whether or not you're using responsive design to change the layout - in which case sometimes this can work quite well. – Simon_Weaver Commented Apr 13, 2016 at 2:00
• 7 This does not really answer the question since you essentially have two tables after each other in the example you gave. (I.e.two divs with the class "table") – Winter Commented Aug 2, 2016 at 14:42

Add a comment | 26

Another suggestion is using flexbox instead of tables altogether. This is a "modern browser" thing of course, but come on, it's 2016 ;)

At least this might be an alternative solution for those looking for an answer to this nowadays, since the original post was from 2010.

Here's a great guide: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/

.table { border: 1px solid red; padding: 2px; max-width: 300px; display: flex; flex-flow: row wrap; } .table-cell { border: 1px solid blue; flex: 1 30%; } .colspan-3 { border: 1px solid green; flex: 1 100%; } <div class="table"> <div class="table-cell"> row 1 - cell 1 </div> <div class="table-cell"> row 1 - cell 2 </div> <div class="table-cell"> row 1 - cell 3 </div> <div class="table-cell colspan-3"> row 2 - cell 1 (spans 3 columns) </div> </div>

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Aug 3, 2016 at 7:49 WinterWinter 2,51722 gold badges2323 silver badges2929 bronze badges 2

• 3 I know this is old, but searches on 'colspan' lead here. In 2021, this is the only answer that fully answers the OP question and has widespread browser support. – Aaron Newman Commented May 27, 2021 at 23:07
• 1 Except that this uses flex. There may be cases where you need cells of multiple rows to align based on the content of any of the cells, which flex doesn't do, and tables do. So not sure about fully answering the OP. – Webber Commented May 14, 2023 at 17:44

Add a comment | 9

To provide an up-to-date answer: The best way to do this today is to use css grid layout like this:

.container { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr; grid-template-rows: auto; grid-template-areas: "top-left top-middle top-right" "bottom bottom bottom" } .item-a { grid-area: top-left; } .item-b { grid-area: top-middle; } .item-c { grid-area: top-right; } .item-d { grid-area: bottom; }

and the HTML

<div class="container"> <div class="item-a">1</div> <div class="item-b">2</div> <div class="item-c">3</div> <div class="item-d">123</div> </div> Share Improve this answer Follow edited Sep 9, 2020 at 7:17 answered Jun 14, 2018 at 19:27 Toby 1 KenobiToby 1 Kenobi 5,01733 gold badges3434 silver badges5252 bronze badges Add a comment | 8 <div style="width: 100%;"> <div style="float: left; width: 33%;">Row 1 - Cell 1</div> <div style="float: left; width: 34%;">Row 1 - Cell 2</div> <div style="float: left; width: 33%;">Row 1 - Cell 3</div> </div> <div style="clear: left; width: 100%;"> Row 2 - Cell 1 </div> Share Improve this answer Follow answered Mar 8, 2010 at 19:18 Dustin LaineDustin Laine 38.5k1010 gold badges8989 silver badges125125 bronze badges 3

• I can't know the width of the cells. – Tower Commented Mar 10, 2010 at 8:33
• 1 Then don't put a width. It should not matter. But if you want them to span the same width then the two main divs need to have the same width. – Dustin Laine Commented Mar 10, 2010 at 18:18
• 2 You can use width: calc(100% / 3) which will do a little better than giving the middle 1% more – ii iml0sto1 Commented Mar 9, 2020 at 15:18

Add a comment | 6

That isn't part of the purview of CSS. colspan describes the structure of the page's content, or gives some meaning to the data in the table, which is HTML's job.

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Mar 8, 2010 at 19:19 mwczmwcz 9,2411010 gold badges4444 silver badges6565 bronze badges 2

• 1 OP explicitely mentions "creating a table-like layout", without structural meaning. Isn't it the very purpose of CSS tables ? There is no objective reason to treat colspan property differently than the whole table, if there is a design-only CSS table element, why not a design-only CSS colspan property… – Skippy le Grand Gourou Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 16:43
• 2 Check out the top-voted answer to this question. Your sentiment is discussed there already and I'm inclined to agree with it. My opinion on the issue has definitely shifted in the five years since I wrote this answer. – mwcz Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 17:33

Add a comment | 4

I've had some success, although it relies on a few properties to work:

table-layout: fixed border-collapse: separate

and cell 'widths' that divide/span easily, i.e. 4 x cells of 25% width:

.div-table-cell, * { box-sizing: border-box; } .div-table { display: table; border: solid 1px #ccc; border-left: none; border-bottom: none; table-layout: fixed; margin: 10px auto; width: 50%; border-collapse: separate; background: #eee; } .div-table-row { display: table-row; } .div-table-cell { display: table-cell; padding: 15px; border-left: solid 1px #ccc; border-bottom: solid 1px #ccc; text-align: center; background: #ddd; } .colspan-3 { width: 300%; display: table; background: #eee; } .row-1 .div-table-cell:before { content: "row 1: "; } .row-2 .div-table-cell:before { content: "row 2: "; } .row-3 .div-table-cell:before { content: "row 3: "; font-weight: bold; } .div-table-row-at-the-top { display: table-header-group; } <div class="div-table"> <div class="div-table-row row-1"> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 1</div> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 2</div> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 3</div> </div> <div class="div-table-row row-2"> <div class="div-table-cell colspan-3"> Cor blimey he's only gone and done it. </div> </div> <div class="div-table-row row-3"> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 1</div> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 2</div> <div class="div-table-cell">Cell 3</div> </div> </div>

https://jsfiddle.net/sfjw26rb/2/

Also, applying display:table-header-group or table-footer-group is a handy way of jumping 'row' elements to the top/bottom of the 'table'.

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jun 27, 2019 at 9:55 user3464561user3464561 10177 bronze badges Add a comment | 3

You could trying using a grid system like http://960.gs/

Your code would be something like this, assuming you're using a "12 column" layout:

<div class="container_12"> <div class="grid_4">1</div><div class="grid_4">2</div><div class="grid_4">3</div> <div class="clear"></div> <div class="grid_12">123</div> </div> Share Improve this answer Follow answered Mar 8, 2010 at 19:20 JeffJeff 4,79155 gold badges3333 silver badges3535 bronze badges Add a comment | 2

Try adding display: table-cell; width: 1%; to your table cell element.

.table-cell { display: table-cell; width: 1%; padding: 4px; border: 1px solid #efefef; } <div class="table"> <div class="table-cell">one</div> <div class="table-cell">two</div> <div class="table-cell">three</div> <div class="table-cell">four</div> </div> <div class="table"> <div class="table-cell">one</div> <div class="table-cell">two</div> <div class="table-cell">three</div> <div class="table-cell">four</div> </div> <div class="table"> <div class="table-cell">one</div> </div>

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jul 15, 2016 at 10:30 Ismail FarooqIsmail Farooq 6,79722 gold badges3030 silver badges4747 bronze badges 3

• how is that going to help? The fundamental concept of a table is that every row has identical cells. If one of the rows has a cell that successfully implements "width:1%", then all the rows will have that column as "width:1%". The point of "colspan" is to take 2 (or more) of the fixed width columns and combine them to get a combined width. – IAM_AL_X Commented Jun 23, 2019 at 9:26
• Can you explain this, please? – Eliezer Berlin Commented Aug 11, 2020 at 13:18
• The OP question said without table tags, table css is pretty much the same thing. there is no reason to do this vs. just creating a table. – Aaron Newman Commented May 27, 2021 at 23:06

Add a comment | 1

The CSS properties "column-count", "column-gap", and "column-span" can do this in a way that keeps all the columns of the pseudo-table inside the same wrapper (HTML stays nice and neat).

The only caveats are that you can only define 1 column or all columns, and column-span doesn't yet work in Firefox, so some additional CSS is necessary to ensure it will displays correctly. https://www.w3schools.com/css/css3_multiple_columns.asp

.split-me { -webkit-column-count: 3; -webkit-column-gap: 0; -moz-column-count: 3; -moz-column-gap: 0; column-count: 3; column-gap: 0; } .cols { /* column-span is 1 by default */ column-span: 1; } div.three-span { column-span: all !important; } /* alternate style for column-span in Firefox */ @-moz-document url-prefix(){ .three-span { position: absolute; left: 8px; right: 8px; top: auto; width: auto; } } <p>The column width stays fully dynamic, just like flex-box, evenly scaling on resize.</p> <div class='split-me'> <div class='col-1 cols'>Text inside Column 1 div.</div> <div class='col-2 cols'>Text inside Column 2 div.</div> <div class='col-3 cols'>Text inside Column 3 div.</div> <div class='three-span'>Text div spanning 3 columns.</div> </div> <style> /* Non-Essential Visual Styles */ html * { font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial; text-align: center; } .split-me>* { padding: 5px; } .cols { border: 2px dashed black; border-left: none; } .col-1 { background-color: #ddffff; border-left: 2px dashed black; } .col-2 { background-color: #ffddff; } .col-3 { background-color: #ffffdd; } .three-span { border: 2px dashed black; border-top: none; text-align: center; background-color: #ddffdd; } </style>

Share Improve this answer Follow edited Aug 15, 2019 at 20:36 answered Aug 15, 2019 at 20:07 MistyDawnMistyDawn 90399 silver badges99 bronze badges 1

• This is the only answer that refers to the CSS Multi-column Layout standard the question is asking about, and it should be marked as the correct answer. – sgfit Commented Jul 12 at 7:15

Add a comment | 0

if you use div and span it will occupy more code size when the datagrid-table row are more in volume. This below code is checked in all browsers

HTML:

<div id="gridheading"> <h4>Sl.No</h4><h4 class="big">Name</h4><h4>Location</h4><h4>column</h4><h4>column</h4><h4>column</h4><h4>Amount(Rs)</h4><h4>View</h4><h4>Edit</h4><h4>Delete</h4> </div> <div class="data"> <h4>01</h4><h4 class="big">test</h4><h4>TVM</h4><h4>A</h4><h4>I</h4><h4>4575</h4><h4>4575</h4></div> <div class="data"> <h4>01</h4><h4 class="big">test</h4><h4>TVM</h4><h4>A</h4><h4>I</h4><h4>4575</h4><h4>4575</h4></div>

CSS:

#gridheading { background: #ccc; border-bottom: 1px dotted #BBBBBB; font-size: 12px; line-height: 30px; text-transform: capitalize; } .data { border-bottom: 1px dotted #BBBBBB; display: block; font-weight: normal; line-height: 20px; text-align: left; word-wrap: break-word; } h4 { border-right: thin dotted #000000; display: table-cell; margin-right: 100px; text-align: center; width: 100px; word-wrap: break-word; } .data .big { margin-right: 150px; width: 200px; } Share Improve this answer Follow answered Oct 3, 2012 at 7:34 Web Designer cum PromoterWeb Designer cum Promoter 1,3361414 silver badges2727 bronze badges Add a comment | 0

If you come here because you have to turn on or off the colspan attribute (say for a mobile layout):

Duplicate the <td>s and only show the ones with the desired colspan:

table.colspan--on td.single { display: none; } table.colspan--off td.both { display: none; } <!-- simple table --> <table class="colspan--on"> <thead> <th>col 1</th> <th>col 2</th> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <!-- normal row --> <td>a</td> <td>b</td> </tr> <tr> <!-- the <td> spanning both columns --> <td class="both" colspan="2">both</td> <!-- the two single-column <td>s --> <td class="single">A</td> <td class="single">B</td> </tr> <tr> <!-- normal row --> <td>a</td> <td>b</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <!-- that's all -->   <!-- stuff only needed for making this interactive example looking good: --> <br><br> <button onclick="toggle()">Toggle colspan</button> <script>/*toggle classes*/var tableClasses = document.querySelector('table').classList; function toggle() { tableClasses.toggle('colspan--on'); tableClasses.toggle('colspan--off'); } </script> <style>/* some not-needed styles to make this example more appealing */ td {text-align: center;} table, td, th {border-collapse: collapse; border: 1px solid black;}</style>

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Aug 2, 2018 at 11:21 luckydonaldluckydonald 6,75655 gold badges4141 silver badges6464 bronze badges Add a comment | 0

I came here because currently the WordPress table block doesn't support the colspan parameter and i thought i will replace it using CSS. This was my solution, assuming that the columns are the same width:

table { width: 100%; } table td { width: 50%; background: #dbdbdb; text-align: center; } table tr:nth-child(2n+1) { position:relative; display:block; height:20px; background:green; } table tr:nth-child(2n+1) td { position:absolute; left:0; right:-100%; width: auto; top:0; bottom:0; background:red; text-align:center; } <table> <tr> <td>row</td> </tr> <tr> <td>cell</td> <td>cell</td> </tr> <tr> <td>row</td> </tr> <tr> <td>cell</td> <td>cell</td> </tr> </table>

Share Improve this answer Follow answered May 31, 2020 at 14:40 passatgtpassatgt 4,43255 gold badges4343 silver badges5656 bronze badges Add a comment | -1

You could always position:absolute; things and specify widths. It's not a very fluid way of doing it, but it would work.

Share Improve this answer Follow edited Jul 6, 2014 at 19:01 Joe 3,82477 gold badges3737 silver badges5555 bronze badges answered Aug 13, 2012 at 14:46 doubleJdoubleJ 1,20611 gold badge1818 silver badges3131 bronze badges 1

• There are far more ways to achieve this than to use bad markup. Absolute positioning to force a layout has always been considered poor practice. – MistyDawn Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 20:46

Add a comment | -1

I've created this fiddle:

http://jsfiddle.net/wo40ev18/3/

HTML <div id="table"> <div class="caption"> Center Caption </div> <div class="group"> <div class="row"> <div class="cell">Link 1t</div> <div class="cell"></div> <div class="cell"></div> <div class="cell"></div> <div class="cell"></div> <div class="cell ">Link 2</div> </div> </div> CSS #table { display:table; } .group {display: table-row-group; } .row { display:table-row; height: 80px; line-height: 80px; } .cell { display:table-cell; width:1%; text-align: center; border:1px solid grey; height: 80px line-height: 80px; } .caption { border:1px solid red; caption-side: top; display: table-caption; text-align: center; position: relative; top: 80px; height: 80px; height: 80px; line-height: 80px; } Share Improve this answer Follow answered May 22, 2015 at 13:18 LaykeLayke 53k1111 gold badges8787 silver badges111111 bronze badges 2

• 1 But I think bootstrap grid can make it very easily – Arun Prasad E S Commented Jul 15, 2016 at 10:28
• This doesn't provide the solution that the asker was looking for. It just creates an inline row of cells. – MistyDawn Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 20:12

Add a comment | -1

Media Query classes can be used to achieve something passable with duplicate markup. Here's my approach with bootstrap:

<tr class="total"> <td colspan="1" class="visible-xs"></td> <td colspan="5" class="hidden-xs"></td> <td class="focus">Total</td> <td class="focus" colspan="2"><%= number_to_currency @cart.total %></td> </tr>

colspan 1 for mobile, colspan 5 for others with CSS doing the work.

Share Improve this answer Follow edited Jul 14, 2015 at 20:48 tomrozb 26.2k3131 gold badges106106 silver badges126126 bronze badges answered May 12, 2014 at 23:52 DigitalDesignDjDigitalDesignDj 1,84511 gold badge1616 silver badges1616 bronze badges 1

• The asker specifically stated he could not use HTML <table> elements. If he could, this would be an easy problem to solve. – MistyDawn Commented Aug 15, 2019 at 20:43

Add a comment | Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged

• css

or ask your own question.

• The Overflow Blog
• We'll Be In Touch - A New Podcast From Stack Overflow!
• The app that fights for your data privacy rights
• Featured on Meta
• More network sites to see advertising test
• We’re (finally!) going to the cloud!
• Call for testers for an early access release of a Stack Overflow extension...

Linked

1 Colspan of css display table did not work 3 colspan equalent in css? 0 colspan and rowspan in css 2.1? 0 CSS table with colspan 0 Colspan in css table 0 How to span columns using CSS 70 Using "display: table-cell" is there a way of getting the "colspan" functionality? 4 merge existing columns using CSS 2 How to create an integrated row in the table? 4 Why my pseudo table doesn't fill rows with colspan? See more linked questions

Related

51 DIV table colspan: how? 1 Applying a colspan via CSS? 10 HTML colspan 0 alternative 0 Making colspans in CSS made tables 3 Issues with colspan in CSS table 0 CSS Tables Colspan 0 HTML colspan issue 2 colspan in CSS? 0 Table-cell with colspan inbetween rows 1 Colspan works with some combinations but not others

Hot Network Questions

• Why「记」for shop names?
• Finite subgroups of multiplicative complex numbers.
• Are "Albergues de peregrinos" typically restricted to pilgrims?
• What is the ontological difference between platonism and non platonism?
• How to Identify Terminals on a BC108 Transistor and Can I Use BC547 Instead?
• Is there an elegant general method for solving linear multiplicative system of equations in modulo 2? Here is an interesting example problem.
• Strange Brackets in String Writing
• Will Spirit trade with SAVEQ when it recovers?
• Is there an Order of Precedence in the three attributes of Christ the Saviour as mentioned in Jn 14:6?
• Why is the total energy of a bound system w.r.t to its COM less than zero?
• Can I protect my EV car charger's cable with aluminum tape and a stainless steel hose helix?
• Accused of violating NDA on thesis
• Unexpected behavior in ParametricPlot
• Does the earliest known use of an "average" occur after the invention of calculus?
• Is it true that according to Kabblah, everthing that Yaakov Avinu did, Yosef also has to do, especially in the context of making 12 tribes?
• Simulating a basic bridge-rectifier circuit
• Did Superdana manufacture a 66 AC outlet power strip/surge protector?
• Testing Puzzles for Puzzle Book: Enigmatic Puzzle
• Generator breaker trips when hooked up for backfeed
• What is the Calvinist/Reformed solution to the Problem of Hell?
• Simplifying Exp[I Mod[x, 2π]] to Exp[I x]
• A dark animated movie about an orphaned girl working in an oppressive factory
• Gluing morphisms of schemes
• 2^N different words with N characters matching a regex of the form [ab][cd]

more hot questions Question feed Subscribe to RSS Question feed

To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.

default