- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Celeron G1610 
vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1610
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1382 vs 1234
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1532 vs 1210
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 482 vs 422
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 900 vs 738
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | December 2012 vs January 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1382 vs 1234 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1532 vs 1210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 482 vs 422 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 900 vs 738 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 22.539
| Specifications (specs) |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 vs 22.539 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1610 CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| Name | Intel Celeron G1610 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1382 | 1234 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1532 | 1210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 482 | 422 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 900 | 738 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2400 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.539 | 26.311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.408 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G1610 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | December 2012 | January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $388 |
| Place in performance rating | 2502 | 2981 |
| Price now | $24.99 | $129.95 |
| Processor Number | G1610 | E8400 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.34 | 4.87 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 94 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C |
| Transistor count | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
| ECC memory support |
| Max memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
| Number of displays supported | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C |
Peripherals |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Anti-Theft technology |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® My WiFi technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
| FSB parity |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Celeron G1610 with others
IntelCeleron G1610 vs 
AMDAthlon II X2 260 IntelCeleron G1610 vs IntelCore i5-3550 IntelCeleron G1610 vs AMDFX-8320 IntelCeleron G1610 vs AMDA6-5400B IntelCeleron G1610 vs IntelPentium G2020 IntelCeleron G1610 vs IntelCeleron G470 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io