- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Celeron G1840 vs Intel Pentium G2020
Intel Celeron G1840 vs Intel Pentium G2020
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1840 and Intel Pentium G2020 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Celeron G1840
vs Intel Pentium G2020
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1840
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1582 vs 1554
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1784 vs 1690
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 573 vs 533
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1061 vs 968
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2298 vs 2000
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2298 vs 2000
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | May 2014 vs January 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1582 vs 1554 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1784 vs 1690 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 573 vs 533 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1061 vs 968 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2298 vs 2000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2298 vs 2000 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G2020
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1840 CPU 2: Intel Pentium G2020
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Celeron G1840 | Intel Pentium G2020 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1582 | 1554 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1784 | 1690 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 573 | 533 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1061 | 968 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2298 | 2000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2298 | 2000 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.123 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G1840 | Intel Pentium G2020 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | May 2014 | January 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $53 | $60 |
| Place in performance rating | 2223 | 2522 |
| Price now | $72.99 | $32.86 |
| Processor Number | G1840 | G2020 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.55 | 24.78 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 177 mm | 94 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million |
Memory |
| ECC memory support |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3 1333 |
Graphics |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
Graphics interfaces |
| DisplayPort |
| DVI |
| eDP |
| HDMI |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| VGA |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support |
Graphics image quality |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Graphics API support |
| DirectX | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | 2011C |
Peripherals |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
| Anti-Theft technology |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
| Intel® TSX-NI |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
| Intel® My WiFi technology |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Celeron G1840 with others
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
AMDPhenom X4 9150e
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 420e
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
IntelCore i5-3570K
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
IntelCore i3-3220T
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelCeleron G1840 vs
IntelCore i3-3210 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language

English

Deutsch

Française

Español

Português

Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io