GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Core i3-8100
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron G4900 on one side and the Intel Core i3-8100 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Core i3-8100 |
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop |
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Coffee Lake-S |
| Family | Celeron 4000 | Core i3-8000 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80684G4900, BXC80684G4900, CM8068403378112, QP9G, SR3W4 | BX80684I38100, BXC80684I38100, CM8068403377308, SR3N5 |
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q4 2017 |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | - | - |
| High performance cores | 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 3.1 GHz | 4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3.6 GHz |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 6 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| TDP | 54 W | 65 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply  | 600W ATX Power Supply | |
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Coffee Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) |
| GPU execution units | 12 | 23 |
| GPU shading units | 96 | 184 |
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 201.6 GFLOPS | 423.2 GFLOPS |
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard |
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
| Security | Software Guard Extension, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, Execute Disable Bit, OS Guard, Boot Guard |
| Max display resolution | 4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (eDP) | 4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@60Hz (eDP) |
| CPU-Z single thread | 351 | 422 |
| CPU-Z multi thread | 707 | 1,654 |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 124 | 154 |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 250 | 616 |
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 252 | 363 |
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 514 | 1,408 |
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 696 | 707 |
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 1,324 | 2,745 |
| PassMark single thread | 1,901 | 2,231 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2,409 | 6,120 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 single core | 3,631 | 4,327 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 6,085 | 12,377 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 5 single core | 716 | 962 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,368 | 3,031 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 6 single core | 670 | 1,194 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 6 multi-core | 1,142 | 3,533 |
| (SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 42.6 GFLOPS | 225.6 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 113 pts / W | 190 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor Intel Core i3-8100 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-8100 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Celeron G4900 is lower. The Intel Celeron G4900 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 422 1,654 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 351 707 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 134%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 154 616 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 124 250 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 146%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 363 1,408 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 252 514 |
In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 174%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 707 2,745 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 696 1,324 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 2,231 6,120 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 1,901 2,409 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 154%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Windows:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 4,327 12,377 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 3,631 6,085 |
In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 103%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 4,665 12,104 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 3,630 5,058 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 139%.With Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 4,480 13,074 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 3,193 5,124 |
In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 155%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. With Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 962 3,031 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 716 1,368 |
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 122%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 1,027 3,272 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 783 1,459 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 124%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality. With Windows:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 1,194 3,533 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 670 1,142 |
In single core, the difference is 78%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 209%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| Intel Core i3-8100 | 1,327 4,077 |
| Intel Celeron G4900 | 698 1,245 |
In single core, the difference is 90%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 227%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
Intel Celeron G4900 AMD EquivalentIntel Core i3-8100 AMD Equivalent
See also:
Intel Celeron G4900TIntel Core i3-8100BIntel Core i3-8100HIntel Core i3-8100TIntel Core i3-8109U GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
