- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Celeron G4900 vs Intel Pentium G4560
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G4900 and Intel Pentium G4560 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Intel Celeron G4900 
vs Intel Pentium G4560 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G4900
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.011 vs 2.198
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 1.204
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.512 vs 2.986
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1013 vs 1003
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1013 vs 1003
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | January 2018 vs January 2017 |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 vs 2.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 vs 1.204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 vs 2.986 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 vs 1003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 vs 1003 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G4560
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2094 vs 1840
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3538 vs 2391
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 841 vs 746
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1863 vs 1353
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.395 vs 18.62
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 vs 0.188
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2030 vs 1910
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3809 vs 3385
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2030 vs 1910
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3809 vs 3385
| Specifications (specs) |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2094 vs 1840 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3538 vs 2391 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 841 vs 746 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1863 vs 1353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.395 vs 18.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 vs 0.188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2030 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3809 vs 3385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2030 vs 1910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3809 vs 3385 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4900 CPU 2: Intel Pentium G4560
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium G4560 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1840 | 2094 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2391 | 3538 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 746 | 841 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1353 | 1863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.011 | 2.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.62 | 22.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.188 | 0.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 1.204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.512 | 2.986 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1013 | 1003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1910 | 2030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3385 | 3809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1013 | 1003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1910 | 2030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3385 | 3809 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2149 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G4900 | Intel Pentium G4560 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Launch date | January 2018 | January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1955 | 1896 |
| Price now | $58.80 | $99.99 |
| Processor Number | G4900 | G4560 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.38 | 14.35 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $108 |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 |
Memory |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphics |
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | 0x5902 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® Clear Video technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® HD Graphics 610 |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
| 4K resolution support |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Graphics API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherals |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) |
| Intel® OS Guard |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
| Secure Boot |
| Intel® Identity Protection technology |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
| Intel® TSX-NI |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Celeron G4900 with others
IntelCeleron G4900 vs 
AMDAthlon II X3 400e IntelCeleron G4900 vs AMDA8-5500 IntelCeleron G4900 vs IntelCore i3-4330 IntelCeleron G4900 vs IntelPentium G4560T IntelCeleron G4900 vs AMDRyzen 5 1400 IntelCeleron G4900 vs IntelPentium G4400T About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io