- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Celeron G4920 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Intel Celeron G4920 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G4920 and Intel Pentium Gold G5400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Celeron G4920 
vs Intel Pentium Gold G5400 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G4920
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 54 Watt vs 58 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2198 vs 1960
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3735 vs 2500
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1108 vs 921
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1108 vs 921
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 vs 1058
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 vs 1058
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3401 vs 1912
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3401 vs 1912
| Specifications (specs) |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2198 vs 1960 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3735 vs 2500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1108 vs 921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1108 vs 921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 vs 1058 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 vs 1058 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3401 vs 1912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3401 vs 1912 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G4920 CPU 2: Intel Pentium Gold G5400
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Celeron G4920 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1960 | 2198 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2500 | 3735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 921 | 1108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 921 | 1108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1058 | 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1058 | 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 3401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 3401 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.324 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G4920 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | January 2018 | January 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 1803 | 1976 |
| Price now | $82.99 | $127.90 |
| Processor Number | G4920 | G5400 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Intel® Pentium® Gold Processor Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.77 | 12.06 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Memory |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
Graphics |
| Device ID | 0x3E93 | 0x3E90/x93 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® Clear Video technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 |
Graphics interfaces |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
| 4K resolution support |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Graphics API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 58 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherals |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) |
| Intel® OS Guard |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
| Secure Boot |
| Intel® Identity Protection technology |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
| Intel® TSX-NI |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Celeron G4920 with others
IntelCeleron G4920 vs 
AMDAthlon II X3 415e IntelCeleron G4920 vs IntelCore i5-4590 IntelCeleron G4920 vs IntelCore i5-4460 IntelCeleron G4920 vs IntelPentium G4600 IntelCeleron G4920 vs AMDRyzen 5 1600X IntelCeleron G4920 vs AMDA6 PRO-7400B About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2024, AskGeek.io