GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
Intel Core i5-6400 vs Intel Celeron G5905
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-6400 on one side and the Intel Celeron G5905 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-6400 | Intel Celeron G5905 |
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop |
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Comet Lake |
| Core name | Skylake-S | Comet Lake-S |
| Family | Core i5-6000 | Celeron 5000 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | CM8066201920506, BX80662I56400, BXC80662I56400, SR2BY | BX80701G5905, BXC80701G5905, CM8070104292115, QVMK, SRK27 |
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q3 2020 |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 3.3 GHz | - |
| High performance cores | - | 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 3.5 GHz |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 4 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| TDP | 65 W | 58 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply  | 600W ATX Power Supply | |
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Comet Lake) |
| GPU execution units | 24 | 12 |
| GPU shading units | 192 | 96 |
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 950 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 403.2 GFLOPS | 201.6 GFLOPS |
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard |
| Maximum temperature | 71°C | 100°C |
| Crypto engine | - | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
| Security | - | Software Guard Extensions, OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
| Max display resolution | - | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| CPU-Z single thread | 327 | 390 |
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1,429 | 793 |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 130 | 168 |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 477 | 301 |
| PassMark single thread | 1,961 | 2,197 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5,149 | 2,846 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 single core | 3,948 | 4,441 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 11,138 | 7,712 |
| (SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 246.1 GFLOPS | 51 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 171 pts / W | 133 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor Intel Core i5-6400 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron G5905 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron G5905 is less. The Intel Celeron G5905 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i5-6400 | 327 1,429 |
| Intel Celeron G5905 | 390 793 |
In single core, the difference is -16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 80%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| Intel Core i5-6400 | 130 477 |
| Intel Celeron G5905 | 168 301 |
In single core, the difference is -23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 58%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread |
| Intel Core i5-6400 | 1,961 5,149 |
| Intel Celeron G5905 | 2,197 2,846 |
In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 81%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Windows:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| Intel Core i5-6400 | 3,948 11,138 |
| Intel Celeron G5905 | 4,441 7,712 |
In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-6400 AMD EquivalentIntel Celeron G5905 AMD Equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-6400TIntel Core i5-6402PIntel Celeron G5900Intel Celeron G5900T GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
