- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 148 Watt
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 34.7x more pipelines: 1664 vs 48
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 6372
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 376
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1750
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2992
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 2792
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 2792
| Specifications (specs) |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 6372 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 376 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 1750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 | 28498 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 | 766 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 9640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 11499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 834 | 371 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 |
| Price now | $407.76 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 148 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1664 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| DisplayPort support |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes |
| HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 |
Memory |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s |
Technologies |
| H265/HEVC Decode |
| Quick Sync |
| 3D Vision |
| Adaptive Vertical Sync |
| CUDA |
| GameStream |
| GameWorks |
| GeForce Experience |
| GeForce ShadowPlay |
| GPU Boost |
| SLI |
| Surround |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt |
| SLI options | 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs 
AMDRadeon HD 8790M IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs IntelHD Graphics 5600 IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMDRadeon Pro 570X IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMDRadeon Vega 9 IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs IntelUHD Graphics 770 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io