- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Pentium G2020 vs Intel Celeron G1620
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Intel Celeron G1620
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G2020 and Intel Celeron G1620 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Intel Pentium G2020 
vs Intel Celeron G1620 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G2020
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1554 vs 1454
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1690 vs 1571
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 533 vs 470
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 968 vs 878
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 29.24 vs 19.177
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.98 vs 0.878
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.123 vs 1.933
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2000 vs 1528
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2000 vs 1528
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | January 2013 vs December 2012 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1554 vs 1454 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1690 vs 1571 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 533 vs 470 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 968 vs 878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.24 vs 19.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.98 vs 0.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.123 vs 1.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2000 vs 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2000 vs 1528 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1620
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.19 vs 0.181
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.19 vs 0.181 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G2020 CPU 2: Intel Celeron G1620
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Pentium G2020 | Intel Celeron G1620 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1554 | 1454 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1690 | 1571 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 533 | 470 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 968 | 878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.24 | 19.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.181 | 0.19 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.98 | 0.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.123 | 1.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2000 | 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2000 | 1528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.514 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G2020 | Intel Celeron G1620 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | January 2013 | December 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | $208 |
| Place in performance rating | 2522 | 2730 |
| Price now | $32.86 | $153.59 |
| Processor Number | G2020 | G1620 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.78 | 4.95 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 94 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Memory |
| ECC memory support |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333 | DDR3 1333 |
Graphics |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | 2011C |
Peripherals |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Anti-Theft technology |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® My WiFi technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Pentium G2020 with others
IntelPentium G2020 vs IntelPentium 4 HT 521 IntelPentium G2020 vs 
AMDPhenom X3 8450e IntelPentium G2020 vs AMDPhenom II X4 920 IntelPentium G2020 vs IntelPentium E6600 IntelPentium G2020 vs AMDPhenom II X6 1035T IntelPentium G2020 vs IntelCeleron G1610T About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io