- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Core i5-6500
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G4400 and Intel Core i5-6500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Pentium G4400 
vs Intel Core i5-6500 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G4400
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 54 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.107 vs 5.811
| Specifications (specs) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 5.811 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2100 vs 1980
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5618 vs 2558
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 899 vs 783
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2938 vs 1425
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2112 vs 1610
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.525 vs 1.534
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 75.209 vs 43.293
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.436 vs 0.234
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.188 vs 1.391
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1575 vs 950
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 2832
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5455 vs 4807
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1575 vs 950
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 2832
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5455 vs 4807
| Specifications (specs) |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB vs 4096 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2100 vs 1980 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5618 vs 2558 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 899 vs 783 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2938 vs 1425 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2112 vs 1610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.525 vs 1.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.209 vs 43.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.436 vs 0.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.188 vs 1.391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1575 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5455 vs 4807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1575 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5455 vs 4807 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G4400 CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6500
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Pentium G4400 | Intel Core i5-6500 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1980 | 2100 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2558 | 5618 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 783 | 899 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1425 | 2938 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1610 | 2112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.534 | 3.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 43.293 | 75.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.234 | 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.391 | 2.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 5.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 950 | 1575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2832 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4807 | 5455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 950 | 1575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2832 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4807 | 5455 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G4400 | Intel Core i5-6500 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Skylake |
| Launch date | September 2015 | 5 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $56 | $192 |
| Place in performance rating | 1688 | 1430 |
| Price now | $69.99 | $234.38 |
| Processor Number | G4400 | i5-6500 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.96 | 9.10 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Die size | 150 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million |
| Maximum core temperature | 71°C |
Memory |
| ECC memory support |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphics |
| Device ID | 0x1902 | 0x1912 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® Clear Video technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Graphics interfaces |
| DisplayPort |
| DVI |
| eDP |
| HDMI |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support |
Graphics image quality |
| 4K resolution support |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | N / A |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | 1080p |
Graphics API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherals |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Identity Protection technology |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) |
| Intel® OS Guard |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
| Secure Boot |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
| Intel® TSX-NI |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Pentium G4400 with others
IntelPentium G4400 vs 
AMDAthlon II X2 245e IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelPentium G620T IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelCore i5-3570T IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelCore i3-7100 IntelPentium G4400 vs AMDA6-7480 IntelPentium G4400 vs AMDRyzen 3 3200G About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io