- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Core i5-6500
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G4400 and Intel Core i5-6500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Pentium G4400 
vs Intel Core i5-6500 Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G4400
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 54 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.107 vs 5.811
| Specifications (specs) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 5.811 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2107 vs 2003
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5625 vs 2578
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 899 vs 783
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2938 vs 1425
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2112 vs 1610
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.525 vs 1.534
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 75.209 vs 43.293
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.436 vs 0.234
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.188 vs 1.391
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1575 vs 950
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 2832
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5455 vs 4807
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1575 vs 950
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 2832
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5455 vs 4807
| Specifications (specs) |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB vs 4096 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2107 vs 2003 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5625 vs 2578 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 899 vs 783 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2938 vs 1425 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2112 vs 1610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.525 vs 1.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.209 vs 43.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.436 vs 0.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.188 vs 1.391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1575 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5455 vs 4807 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1575 vs 950 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 2832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5455 vs 4807 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G4400 CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6500
| PassMark - Single thread mark | | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | Intel Pentium G4400 | Intel Core i5-6500 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2003 | 2107 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2578 | 5625 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 783 | 899 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1425 | 2938 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1610 | 2112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.534 | 3.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 43.293 | 75.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.234 | 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.391 | 2.188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 5.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 950 | 1575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2832 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4807 | 5455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 950 | 1575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2832 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4807 | 5455 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G4400 | Intel Core i5-6500 |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Skylake |
| Launch date | September 2015 | 5 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $56 | $192 |
| Place in performance rating | 1691 | 1431 |
| Price now | $69.99 | $234.38 |
| Processor Number | G4400 | i5-6500 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.96 | 9.10 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Die size | 150 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million |
| Maximum core temperature | 71°C |
Memory |
| ECC memory support |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphics |
| Device ID | 0x1902 | 0x1912 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology |
| Intel® Clear Video technology |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Graphics interfaces |
| DisplayPort |
| DVI |
| eDP |
| HDMI |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support |
Graphics image quality |
| 4K resolution support |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | N / A |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | 1080p |
Graphics API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 54 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherals |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Identity Protection technology |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) |
| Intel® OS Guard |
| Intel® Secure Key technology |
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
| Secure Boot |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| Idle States |
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) |
| Intel® TSX-NI |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility |
| Thermal Monitoring |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Pentium G4400 with others
IntelPentium G4400 vs 
AMDPhenom X3 8650 IntelPentium G4400 vs AMDAthlon II X2 245e IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelPentium G620T IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelCore i5-3570T IntelPentium G4400 vs IntelCore i3-7100 IntelPentium G4400 vs AMDA8-7600 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2024, AskGeek.io