Joined Cases C-92/09 And C-93/09, Volker Und Markus Schecke ...
Common Market Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011
13 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2011
See all articles by Michal BobekMichal Bobek
Supreme Administrative Court
Date Written: November 12, 2011
Abstract
Thou shalt not seek to know the amount of thy neighbour’s subsidy! Skimming through the decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice in Schecke and taking into account that the Court declared the contested EU measures invalid, one is tempted to conclude that a new commandment has indeed been established. In a conflict between the transparency of public spending on the one hand and the right to privacy and protection of personal data of natural persons who receive money from Union’s agricultural funds on the other, the latter seems to prevail. The personal data of beneficiaries are not to be disclosed online.
This case note offers a different reading of Court’s decision in Schecke. It is suggested that the Court made no definite value choice as to whether the publication of personal data of funds beneficiaries is permissible or not. The Court only invalidated the particular publication scheme established by the two challenged regulations, because the scheme itself was uncertain about the precise aims it wished to fulfill and, consequently, could not strike a proper balance between the various interests involved.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bobek, Michal, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09, Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert, Judgement of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010 N.Y.R. (November 12, 2011). Common Market Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1958609Michal Bobek (Contact Author)
Supreme Administrative Court ( email )
Moravské náměstí 6Brno, 65740Czech Republic
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Place Job OpeningPaper statistics
Downloads 650 Abstract Views 3,708 Rank 96,664 19 References PlumX MetricsRelated eJournals
-
Information Privacy Law eJournal
FollowInformation Privacy Law eJournal
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS 460 PAPERS 8,931 This Journal is curated by: Chris Jay Hoofnagle at University of California, Berkeley - School of Law , Daniel J. Solove at George Washington University - Law School
Từ khóa » C-92/09 Og C-93/09
-
Joined Cases C-92/09 And C-93/09 - CURIA - List Of Results
-
62009CA0092 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
-
European Court Of Justice Cases C-92/09 And C-93/09 | Electronic ...
-
[PDF] Joined Cases C-92/09 And C-93/09 Volker Und Markus Schecke ...
-
Transparency: Let There Be Light? - JSTOR
-
Volker Und Markus Schecke GbR, Hartmut Eifert V Land Hessen - Jstor
-
The Joined Cases C-92/09 And C-93/09 Volker Und Markus ...
-
VOLKER UND MARKUS SCHECKE: Interference With EU Rights Of ...
-
Volker Und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09), Hartmut - ProQuest
-
Volker Und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09) And Hartmut Eifert (C-93 ...
-
[PDF] A New Proportionality Test For Fundamental Rights?
-
Volker Und Markus Schecke GbR And Hartmut Eifert V Land Hessen.
-
Joined Cases C-92/09 Og C-93/09: Volker Und Markus Schecke ...
-
Volker Und Markus Schecke GbR, Hartmut Eifert Vs. Land Hessen ...