Marantz PM7000N Vs Cambridge CXA61 - What Hi-Fi? Forum
Search
Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only Search Advanced search… Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only By: Search Advanced… Log in RegisterSearch
Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only Search Advanced search… Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only By: Search Advanced… Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar Menu Install the app Install- Home
- Featured
- Forums New posts Trending Search forums
- What's new New posts Latest activity
- Members Current visitors Billboard Trophies
- The best early Black Friday 2024 UK deals: headphones, OLED TVs, Dolby Atmos soundbars and more
- Thread starter Zebede1980
- Start date Jun 14, 2020
- Home
- Forums
- Audio
- Hi-Fi
- 1
- 2
Go to page
Go Next LastZebede1980
Well-known member
Jun 14, 2020 7 1 1,525 Visit site Does anyone have any information that can help with a comparison of the PM7000N and the CXA81? Obviously the pm7000n is a network player as well, but the review here scores the sound quality really well, so my question is - is it in the same league as the cxa81 for pure sound quality, other features aside, or does it lag behind and pay a price for being a all-in-one box at this price range? has anyone heard them both side by side? cheers! Aast2312
Well-known member
May 3, 2020 31 6 45 Visit site Hi, I can share my experience of the CXA81 which may help. I was also considering the 7000N but decided on the CXA81 largely based on how I decided to use it. I wanted to limit box size and keep all my multi-room platform simple with my existing Sonos products. What I ended up doing was using my existing Mac mini (headless) and direct feed into the CXA81. I then installed roon and can control everything by remote app. Obviously everyone has different uses and set-ups but considering the 7000N provides a one box solution I would consider my set-up close to that. The SQ of the CXA81 is vey impressive. Having owned Naim and Devialet I was still blown away by how good the CXA81 performs. I did consider that the 7000N has treble and bass controls (especially that I have them in a small room) but roon has DSP and EQ which can be used if needed. Only disadvantage with roon is the cost unfortunately. I was not able to complete an A/B comparison between the CXA81 and 7000N but also did not feel I needed to as I was happy with the sound from the Cambridge. Hope this helps.Zebede1980
Well-known member
Jun 14, 2020 7 1 1,525 Visit site Thanks for the feedback, it’s really useful to hear and has already helped with my thinking. The marantz appeals as it has all the services built in, but I really do want sound quality to be the primary factor. I already own a echo link which I plan to use to feed amazon music hd into the amp by toslink. That would basically give me the same feature set as the marantz for my needs, probably making the cxa81 the better choice. the reports for the marantz just sounded so good for sound that I wondered if I was missing a trick! Aast2312
Well-known member
May 3, 2020 31 6 45 Visit site Hi, Glad it helped. I am sure the Marantz is very good and the reviews support it. Just a few things that helped me choose the CXA81 is the DAC quality as well as the future flexibility if I do decide to do something slight different (as it is still a separate amp). I do think the key to the selection is understanding the setup. For a while I was considering the Bluenote and did try it but preferred the sound of the CXA81 DAC. That just led me to experiment with roon and then I found a match I could not better in my situation. DDeleted member 108165
Guest
Whatever you do you would need to audition these side by side as our ears are not all the same. If you want to buy blind that's fine, I've done it several times and been happy with the result, however, there is nothing like a listening session to make the final call.daytona600
Well-known member
Oct 5, 2012 965 689 19,770 Visit siteMarantz PM7000N Review - The Absolute Sound
Despite having a foot firmly in just about every camp imaginable, the Marantz PM7000N sounded great and worked seamlessly well. www.theabsolutesound.comZebede1980
Well-known member
Jun 14, 2020 7 1 1,525 Visit siteDougK said: Whatever you do you would need to audition these side by side as our ears are not all the same. If you want to buy blind that's fine, I've done it several times and been happy with the result, however, there is nothing like a listening session to make the final call. Click to expand...Definitely agree, I am aiming to do my research and form a plan and then go and listen to it to confirm I’m happy. But with current situation don’t want to mess anyone about trying 4 different setups! Also, richer sounds are offering extended home trials so I am planning to buy it there and have that insurance!
rainsoothe
Well-known member
Apr 30, 2012 901 436 19,270 Visit siteZebede1980 said: Definitely agree, I am aiming to do my research and form a plan and then go and listen to it to confirm I’m happy. But with current situation don’t want to mess anyone about trying 4 different setups! Also, richer sounds are offering extended home trials so I am planning to buy it there and have that insurance! Click to expand...Best way to go about it, you get to hear the stuff in your own system and, most importantly, room.
37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit site I've had the CXA81 for a few weeks and am slightly torn by it, some times I think it is the best thing in the world, sometimes I find it a bit too bright and lacking in the low end. I'm receiving a PM7000N tomorrow to demo side by side. I was upgrading from a Marantz PM6003 and KEFQ100s to CXA81 and KEF LS50s. It's been a very hard decision. The CXA81 is definitely sweet at times but to really enjoy it I've had to use an equalizer in my Amazon Music app, something in me says that's wrong and I don't want to depend on an app on my phone to enjoy my £1000 amp! Once I get them side by side I will let you know what I think.Deleted member 108165
Guest
If you don't like it after a few weeks then it's not the right amp for you... try something else. Let us know how you get on with the Marantz. Rrainsoothe
Well-known member
Apr 30, 2012 901 436 19,270 Visit siteDougK said: If you don't like it after a few weeks then it's not the right amp for you... try something else. Let us know how you get on with the Marantz. Click to expand...Maybe it's just not the right combination, I'm not sure either would work with the LS50, as they're pretty demanding speakers. They also can be a bit bright themselves. I'd look at Arcam SA30 or something like that.
Simon 13th note
Well-known member
BANNED Jul 27, 2020 183 75 170 Visit site I can’t help with a comparison but I looked at the PM7000N in my film review. comparison to one cast from Cyrus. my recommendation if you want sound quality and thin out streaming features would be Hegel - a bit more probably. Add a streaming box to it. Node 2i37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit site I tried the PM7000N and it was a definite step up from the PM6003 which I had. In the end I kept the CXA81 over the Marantz, but I haven't got anything bad to say about the PM7000N at all. If I had never heard the CXA81 I would have been more than happy with the PM7000N . With the CXA81 some things sound really amazing (for example Linda Rondstadt's Poor Poor Pitiful Me), other things sound too bright (take for example 1960s Rolling Stones), This is not a problem with the PM7000N. The PM7000N was a more balanced, muscular sound, the CXA81 has great sound staging and when it sounds good it is very very good. The reason I kept the CXA81 over the PM7000N was really in the end I wanted to upgrade my system and sticking with PM7000N didn't seem like a real jump. The CXA81 definitely is different from what I had before and so that makes it exciting, and in the end that won me over. The other thing was the support for Bluetooth AptX HD, the irony was that even though the PM7000N was full of bells and whistles, for bluetooth, the CXA81 won. I hated the HEOS app that came with the PM7000N, I knew I couldn't live with the HEOS app, so that helped clinched the deal.jonathanRD
Well-known member
Jan 27, 2011 179 52 18,670 Visit site37up said: I tried the PM7000N and it was a definite step up from the PM6003 which I had. In the end I kept the CXA81 over the Marantz, but I haven't got anything bad to say about the PM7000N at all. If I had never heard the CXA81 I would have been more than happy with the PM7000N . With the CXA81 some things sound really amazing (for example Linda Rondstadt's Poor Poor Pitiful Me), other things sound too bright (take for example 1960s Rolling Stones), This is not a problem with the PM7000N. The PM7000N was a more balanced, muscular sound, the CXA81 has great sound staging and when it sounds good it is very very good. The reason I kept the CXA81 over the PM7000N was really in the end I wanted to upgrade my system and sticking with PM7000N didn't seem like a real jump. The CXA81 definitely is different from what I had before and so that makes it exciting, and in the end that won me over. The other thing was the support for Bluetooth AptX HD, the irony was that even though the PM7000N was full of bells and whistles, for bluetooth, the CXA81 won. I hated the HEOS app that came with the PM7000N, I knew I couldn't live with the HEOS app, so that helped clinched the deal. Click to expand...Out of interest what speakers did you end up pairing with the CXA81? M
manicm
Well-known member
May 1, 2008 2,182 818 20,570 Visit site It depends on what you want from a device. The PM7000N is a fully networked one-box amp i.e. you don’t need Sonos etc. I understand that the CXA81 or even the 61 may sound better, but personally if WHF’s review is to be trusted I would choose it over the CXs, as my preference is for the one box solution. Especially paired with a B&W 606. Alternatively try the Bluesound Powernode 2i as well - which has been universally praised. Either way in the 21st century having several boxes when just one will do just doesn’t appeal to me anymore. Both the Powernode 2i and PM7000N represent excellent vfm, as both give equal importance to the amp section as well.manicm
Well-known member
May 1, 2008 2,182 818 20,570 Visit site I think the PM7007N might just be able to get away with the LS50s.37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit sitejonathanRD said: Out of interest what speakers did you end up pairing with the CXA81? Click to expand...LS50s
37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit sitemanicm said: I think the PM7007N might just be able to get away with the LS50s. Click to expand...I thought the PM7000N was fine with LS50s. I'm not an expert, just a normal person who listens to music.
jonathanRD
Well-known member
Jan 27, 2011 179 52 18,670 Visit siteSimon 13th note said: Hi everyone I came on here to give advice and help and chat, I make peanuts from the work, and the moderators come on and start criticising you For Sharing films and doing so. So I won’t bother. Click to expand...Simon, if you came on here to give advice and help and chat, nobody is stopping you continue to do that - are they? No need for you to reply as I won't respond, and we don't need to debate it. But you could stick around to give advice from time to time about your real life experiences Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2020
jonathanRD
Well-known member
Jan 27, 2011 179 52 18,670 Visit site37up said: LS50s Click to expand...Do you have all your new kit at home now? I am just interested in how you are finding the pairing in your own room?
37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit sitejonathanRD said: Do you have all your new kit at home now? I am just interested in how you are finding the pairing in your own room? Click to expand...I sent back the PM7000N, but for a while I had the following in my living room (I promised my wife it was temporary!) Although I still have Q100s running in an A/B mode. AMPS: Cambridge Audio CXA81 Marantz PM7000N Marantz PM6003 SPEAKERS KEF LS50s KEF Q100s I obviously tried all combinations. I must say that initially I found the LS50/CXA81 combination to be too "bright" for my ears. I was drawn back to my old set up, but over time (it's probably my ears that changed not the kit), what I thought was too bright was probably just more detail. I do find it a wee bit light on the bass site. But I can definitely hear "more" going on, and on some stuff it is really exciting. I had the CXA81 for a for a few weeks, before going back to the sales guy and said I wasn't 100% happy (he was top notch), and he suggested I tried the PM7000N as it would be more like the sound I was accustomed to. He was right. I had to buy the PM7000N, with the understanding that I would return one of the other (or both!). I tried new amp, old speakers; new amp, new speakers; new amp, both speakers etc etc etc I think the comparison is important, I think you HAVE to try them out in your living room, with YOUR music. I found that the CXA81/LS50 is unforgiving, for example, bootleg recordings are hard to listen to. But put something on that has some meat on the bones, and it really is good. The Marantz is definitely more forgiving. Features of CXA81 which PM7000N did not have (this were nice to have, but helped seal the deal)
- AptX HD bluetooth (I preferred using the Amazon Music app to the HEOS app, so this made more sense for me)
- A/B speakers (I liked this as I have my old speakers wired into the CXA81)
- NO TONE CONTROLS. I can mitiagate this with the equalizer in the Amazon music app. But I don't like doing that, so tend not to. All I was doing as adding some bass, so I added (in process) a sub woofer.
- With HEOS you can get best available HD format from (for example) Amazon HD. My phone and FireTV aren't capable of the highest format.
jonathanRD
Well-known member
Jan 27, 2011 179 52 18,670 Visit site37up said: I think the comparison is important, I think you HAVE to try them out in your living room, with YOUR music. I found that the CXA81/LS50 is unforgiving, for example, bootleg recordings are hard to listen to. But put something on that has some meat on the bones, and it really is good. The Marantz is definitely more forgiving. Click to expand...Interesting write up and I think the above statement is absolutely key and I hope anybody else in your position takes note of this. At least now you know what you will like and not like about your purchases, and you have made a choice with your ears wide open to what you are getting. Enjoy your new setup!
manicm
Well-known member
May 1, 2008 2,182 818 20,570 Visit site I’ve been using the HEOS app for over two years now, and have no problems with it, it has a few minor quirks but you get accustomed to it pretty quickly.37up
Active member
Jul 16, 2020 6 7 25 Visit sitemanicm said: I’ve been using the HEOS app for over two years now, and have no problems with it, it has a few minor quirks but you get accustomed to it pretty quickly. Click to expand...Yeah, maybe I am a bit harsh on HEOS, I didn't use it much. In practise I actually use a 1st generation Amazon Fire TV, which has optical out straight into the amp. It's nice cause I get to use my TV as the display and my wife and kids love seeing the lyrics on the TV :-D
LosAngelos
Active member
Sep 8, 2020 6 4 25 Visit site wow never heard someone hate heos that much..In fact heos is a reason to buy for many people like me. I've been using PM7000N more than a month with only Heos app (to access media server flac files, flac audio on tidal ) and sound quality is nothing but phenomenal. Sax tones are so much real like it's playing in front of me,, never bright, just thick and powerfull as it should be.With many amps i tried including CXA80, violing, sax tones are going thing, bright ,not powerfull with bass / thick tones but with PM7000N, first time i feel such power of an instrument. Never use any kind of bluetooth connection due to big loss in audio quality, even aptx HD supports transfer rate only up to 576kbps almost half of a flac audio file. If you're in the market of such amplifier, BT is a no GO. Just use .flac files all the time to get best from your amp.- 1
- 2
Go to page
Go Next Last You must log in or register to reply here.Similar threads
P EMF Sequel vs. Cambridge Audio CXA61- PD64
- Oct 1, 2024
- Hi-Fi
- yohann
- Feb 15, 2024
- Hi-Fi
- My2Cents
- Nov 13, 2023
- Hi-Fi
- Entrigo
- Mar 27, 2024
- Hi-Fi 2
- My2Cents
- Nov 20, 2023
- Hi-Fi
TRENDING THREADS
- O QuestionWhich integrated
- Started by ossieb
- Yesterday at 5:01 PM
- Replies: 11
- Your Song/Track of the Day
- Started by MUSICRAFT
- May 25, 2015
- Replies: 5K
- E QuestionPossible to connect two amps to same speakers?
- Started by El Puerco Volante
- Wednesday at 12:21 PM
- Replies: 40
- The film thread.
- Started by GSV Ethics Gradient
- Jan 5, 2022
- Replies: 727
- I've built a bargain budget hi-fi system with these 4 superb Cyber Monday deals
- Started by What Hi-Fi?
- Today at 8:00 AM
- Replies: 0
- You're happy with your HiFi system but you feel it could be tweaked further to give its best.
- Started by Jasonovich
- Yesterday at 6:33 PM
- Replies: 3
- QuestionWhere can I buy the latest the what hifi magazine at?
- Started by Nathano2022
- Friday at 11:39 PM
- Replies: 16
Latest posts
- You're happy with your HiFi system but you feel it could be tweaked further to give its best.
- Latest: Fandango Andy
- 7 minutes ago
- The film thread.
- Latest: davidf
- 12 minutes ago
- QuestionWhich integrated
- Latest: Al ears
- 50 minutes ago
- B room acoustics needed for beginner in bedroom
- Latest: basscleaner
- Today at 7:19 AM
- #nowspinning. What you spinning #nowplaying
- Latest: martois
- Today at 3:09 AM
- G Got a deal on a Yamaha R-N800a... it's amazing
- Latest: gasolin
- Today at 12:41 AM
- QuestionWhaferdale Diamond 12.3 vs 12.4
- Latest: nopiano
- Yesterday at 9:00 PM
Share this page
Facebook X (Twitter) Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link COMPANY What Hi-Fi? is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site. © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885. RESOURCES- Advertising
- Cookies Policies
- Privacy
- Term & Conditions
Từ khóa » Cxa61 Vs Pm7000n
-
Compare Marantz PM7000N Vs Cambridge Audio CXA61 - Crutchfield
-
Amp / Streamer Choice - CXA81 Or Marantz PM7000N | AVForums
-
Marantz Pm7000n Vs Cambridge Audio Cxa81 - Reddit
-
Marantz PM7000N Integrated Amplifier Reviewed
-
Cambridge Audio CXA81 VS Marantz PM6007 Demo (Longer Version)
-
Cambridge Audio CXA61 Review - The Master Switch
-
Hifi System Upgrade | Audioholics Home Theater Forums
-
Cambridge Audio CXA61 Stereo Two-Channel Amplifier With ...
-
Any Experiences With Marantz PM700N Integrated?
-
Cambridge CXA61 Series 2 Audio Integrated Stereo Amplifier
-
CambridgeAudio CXA81 V/s Bluesound PowerNode2i
-
Cambridge Audio CXA61 Silver - LDLC
-
Stereo System From Scratch After Trying Pm7000n - AVS Forum
-
Marantz PM7000N Integrated Stereo Amplifier With HEOS Built-in