MSI Optix G32CQ4 Vs Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU] - DeviceList

Có thể bạn quan tâm

DeviceList
Smartphones
CPUs
Video Cards
Search

Home / Monitor / MSI Optix G32CQ4 vs Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU]MSI Optix G32CQ4 vs Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU] Specifications

Food
Dimensions, weight
Additional equipment
Structure
The main parameters
Screen
Functions
Screen
General parameters
Interfaces

MSI Optix G32CQ4 64% DeviceList score vs

Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU] 67% DeviceList score We compared the characteristics of MSI Optix G32CQ4 and Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU] and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.MSI Optix G32CQ4 benefits

Screen diagonal

31.5 '' 4.5 '' (16.7%) better vs 27 ''

Pixel response time, ms

1 ms -3 ms (-75%) better vs 4 ms

Pixel Size

272 μm -39 μm (-12.5%) better vs 311 μm

Pixel density

93 ppi 12 ppi (14.8%) better vs 81 ppi

Maximum height with stand

509.5 mm -10.9 mm (-2.1%) better vs 520.4 mm

Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU] benefits Winner in comparison

Price-quality ratio

18.4 % 5.4 % (41.5%) better vs 13 %

Price at the time of release

321.5 USD -80.4 USD (-20%) better vs 401.9 USD

Brightness

350 Cd/m² 100 Cd/m² (40%) better vs 250 Cd/m²

Height adjustment

Power consumption during operation

33 Wt -25 Wt (-43.1%) better vs 58 Wt

Width with stand

611.99 mm -97.41 mm (-13.7%) better vs 709.4 mm

Minimum height with stand

390.4 mm -119.1 mm (-23.4%) better vs 509.5 mm

Thickness with stand

234.8 mm -14.1 mm (-5.7%) better vs 248.9 mm

Weight with stand

6.1 kg -0.3 kg (-4.7%) better vs 6.4 kg

Width without stand

611.99 mm -97.41 mm (-13.7%) better vs 709.4 mm

Comparison of all specifications

MSI Optix G32CQ4

Lenovo G27c-10 [66A3GACBEU]

Food
Power consumption during operation
58 Wt	33 Wt -25 Wt (-43.1%) better
Power consumption in sleep mode
no data	0.5 Wt

Dimensions, weight
Width without stand
709.4 mm	611.99 mm -97.41 mm (-13.7%) better
Weight with stand
6.4 kg	6.1 kg -0.3 kg (-4.7%) better
Thickness with stand
248.9 mm	234.8 mm -14.1 mm (-5.7%) better
Maximum height with stand
509.5 mm -10.9 mm (-2.1%) better	520.4 mm
Minimum height with stand
509.5 mm	390.4 mm -119.1 mm (-23.4%) better
Width with stand
709.4 mm	611.99 mm -97.41 mm (-13.7%) better

Additional equipment
Built-in speaker systemAbility to play audio using built-in speakers in the monitor. A useful function in the absence of speakers for reproduction of undemanding audio quality.

Structure
Tilt adjustment
Swivel stand
VESA SizeThe layout of the mounting holes for mounting on the bracket.
100x100	100x100
Portrait modeThe ability to rotate the monitor screen 90 ° for applications where vertical rather than horizontal workspace is important.
Height adjustment

The main parameters

Screen

Functions
sRGB color gamut
114.8 %	no data

Screen
Dynamic contrast ratio
100M:1	3M:1
Touch Screen
Matrix illumination type
LED	LED
Curved screen
The maximum refresh rate of the screenThe higher the refresh rate of the screen, the smoother the perceived picture. This is especially important for dynamic games.
165 Hz	165 Hz
Pixel Size
272 μm -39 μm (-12.5%) better	311 μm
Horizontal viewing angle
178 °	178 °
Vertical viewing angle
178 °	178 °
Pixel response time, ms
1 ms -3 ms (-75%) better	4 ms
HDR Support
Brightness
250 Cd/m²	350 Cd/m² 100 Cd/m² (40%) better
Aspect Ratio
16:9	16:9
The manufacturing technology of the matrix
VA	VA
Maximum resolution
2560x1440	1920x1080
Screen diagonal
31.5 '' 4.5 '' (16.7%) better	27 ''
Radius of curvature
1500R	1500R
Frequency at maximum resolution
165 Hz	165 Hz
Pixel density
93 ppi 12 ppi (14.8%) better	81 ppi
Dynamic screen refresh technology
AMD FreeSync Premium	AMD FreeSync Premium
Contrast ratio
3000:1	3000:1
Vision protection technology

General parameters
Price at the time of release
401.9 USD	321.5 USD -80.4 USD (-20%) better
Price-quality ratioThe sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
13 %	18.4 % 5.4 % (41.5%) better