- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 
vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x better floating-point performance: 602.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1068 vs 716
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 119
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3954 vs 3722
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1598
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3636
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1598
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3636
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 385 vs 326
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 vs 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 vs 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3636 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 vs 326 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 | 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | 326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GK208B |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1001 | 1297 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
| 3D Vision |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| Verde Drivers |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 920MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs 
ATIFireGL T2-128 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs 
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io