- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1068 vs 793
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 149
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3954 vs 3866
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1589
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3339
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1589
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3339
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 385 vs 345
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 vs 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 vs 3866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 vs 345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1068 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3954 | 3866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | 345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1001 | 1301 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDCP content protection |
| HDMI |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
| Laptop size | medium sized |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Technologies |
| 3D Vision |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| Verde Drivers |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support |
| Direct Compute |
| FXAA |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 920MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs 
ATIFireGL T2-128 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs 
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 NVIDIAGeForce 920MX vs AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io