- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) 
vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 952 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 1288
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 195
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 5533
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 23.565
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 165.338
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.09
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 2053
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3577
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 2053
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3577
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 1 March 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 952 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 783.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 1288 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 5533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 23.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 vs 165.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 1.09 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 495 vs 122
| Specifications (specs) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | 1288 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | 5533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 23.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 165.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 1.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM108 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 1 March 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 586 | 1100 |
| Price now | $124.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 952 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 24.48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 17 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 2-slot |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
| 3D Vision |
| Ansel |
| CUDA |
| GameStream |
| GPU Boost |
| Multi Monitor |
| Multi-Projection |
| ShadowWorks |
| VR Ready |
| GameWorks |
| Optimus |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 540 NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIAQuadro P620 NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs 
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs AMDRadeon R9 350 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io