- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1046 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 5939
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 562
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 18068
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 49.824
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 1089.67
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 4.899
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 vs 44.06
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 103.884
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 7412
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 7412
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 30 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1046 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 vs 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 vs 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 vs 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 vs 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 vs 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 vs 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 vs 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 vs 1065
| Benchmarks |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 vs 1065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 | 2155 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU116 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 30 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 258 | 515 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $449.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.45 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C |
| Pipelines | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort count | 1 |
| DisplayPort support |
| HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
| 3D Gaming |
| 3D Vision |
| 3D Vision Live |
| Adaptive VSync |
| Blu Ray 3D |
| CUDA |
| FXAA |
| GPU Boost |
| PhysX |
| TXAA |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs 
AMDRadeon HD 7850M NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs AMDRadeon R9 Nano NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIATesla M40 NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIATesla P100 SXM2 NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs AMDRadeon RX 5500 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io