NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Vs AMD Radeon R9 280X - Technical City
Có thể bạn quan tâm
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 404 | 407 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.83 | 4.88 |
| Power efficiency | 4.78 | 4.30 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 (12 years ago) | 8 October 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
R9 280X has 27% better value for money than GTX 770.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 138.9 | 128.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.333 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 275 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1753 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort support | - | + |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | - | + |
| CrossFire | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| HD3D | - | + |
| LiquidVR | - | + |
| TressFX | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
| Blu Ray 3D | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| PhysX | + | - |
| 3D Vision Live | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | + | - |
Từ khóa » Gtx 770 4gb Vs R9 280x 3gb
-
AMD R9 280X Vs Nvidia GTX 770 - GPU UserBenchmarks
-
R9 280X Vs GTX 770 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-3770K Vs ...
-
Radeon R9 280X Vs GeForce GTX 770: Which Is The Best Graphics ...
-
AMD Radeon R9 280X Vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
-
AMD Radeon R9 280X Vs Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB
-
GTX 770 Vs R9 280X - 8 Games Tested On 1080P - High Settings
-
R9 380X Vs R9 280X Vs GTX 770 Vs GTX 960 Test In 7 Games
-
Radeon R9 280X Compare GeForce GTX 770 GPU
-
AMD Radeon R9 280X Vs NVidia GeForce GTX 770 | Tech Advisor
-
GTX 770 Vs R9 280x : R/buildapc - Reddit
-
GeForce GTX 770 Vs Radeon R9 280X - HWBench
-
R9 280x Vs Gtx 770 Which One?? :: Hardware And Operating Systems
-
GTX 770(2Gb) Vs R9 280x(3Gb) - Tom's Hardware Forum
-
Gtx 770 Vs Hd7950/r9 280 For G3258 | AnandTech Forums