- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 25.21
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 51.009
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3642
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3242
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3642
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 26 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 vs 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 vs 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1814
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 195
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 6461
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 406.203
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 30.251
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2796
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2796
- Around 75% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 632
| Specifications (specs) |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 vs 1814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 vs 6461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 vs 406.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 vs 30.251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 vs 2796 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 vs 632 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 3388 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 9482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3242 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 26 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1013 | 810 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 134 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 768 |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| HDMI |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 |
Technologies |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GeForce Experience |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| 3D Blu-Ray |
| 3D Gaming |
| 3D Vision |
| 3D Vision Live |
| Adaptive VSync |
| FXAA |
| SLI |
| TXAA |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460 NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
AMDFirePro W4170M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce 845M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io