- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 86.208
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 10 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 86.208 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 1814
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 195
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 6461
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 31.613
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 406.203
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 2.034
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 30.251
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 2796
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 2796
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 632
| Specifications (specs) |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 1814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 6461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 31.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 406.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 2.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 30.251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 632 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 5345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 10 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1013 | 554 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 |
| Price now | $474.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 170 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1344 |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| HDMI |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| SLI options | 3-way |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 |
Technologies |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GeForce Experience |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| 3D Blu-Ray |
| 3D Gaming |
| 3D Vision |
| Adaptive VSync |
| FXAA |
| SLI |
| TXAA |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460 NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
AMDFirePro W4170M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce 845M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io