- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 1814
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 195
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 6461
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 31.613
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 406.203
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 2.034
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 30.251
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 2796
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3686
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 2796
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3686
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 632
| Specifications (specs) |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 1814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 6461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 31.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 406.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 2.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 30.251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3686 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 632 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1013 | 576 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 |
| Price now | $249.99 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 170 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1152 |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| HDMI |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GeForce Experience |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| 3D Gaming |
| 3D Vision |
| 3D Vision Live |
| Adaptive VSync |
| Blu Ray 3D |
| FXAA |
| PhysX |
| SLI |
| TXAA |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language

English

Deutsch

Française

Español

Português

Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io