- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3340
- Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 vs 369
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 384
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1814
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 195
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 6461
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 31.613
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 406.203
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 2.034
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 30.251
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 107.608
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 2796
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 2796
| Specifications (specs) |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 1814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 6461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 vs 31.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 vs 406.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 vs 2.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 vs 30.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 vs 107.608 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 2796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1013 | 371 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 |
| Price now | $407.76 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1664 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 148 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1664 |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
| G-SYNC support |
| HDCP |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt |
| SLI options | 4x |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
| CUDA |
| GameWorks |
| GeForce Experience |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
| 3D Vision |
| Adaptive Vertical Sync |
| GameStream |
| GeForce ShadowPlay |
| SLI |
| Surround |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460 NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs 
AMDFirePro W4170M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs NVIDIAGeForce 845M NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io