- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 3750
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 307
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 28933
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 849.116
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 6326
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3354
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 6326
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3354
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 2114
| Specifications (specs) |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 vs 3750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 307 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 vs 28933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 vs 849.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 vs 2114 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | | |
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1843.045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 8926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 8062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 8926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 8062 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 3656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 524 | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
| GPU Boost |
| Optimus |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs 
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs 
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs AMDRadeon R9 370X NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs 
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io