- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 
vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 1088
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 253
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 3074
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 8.649
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 174.555
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 0.642
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 11.732
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 16.3
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 1892
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 861
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1443
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 1892
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 861
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1443
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
| Benchmarks |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 vs 1088 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 vs 3074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 vs 8.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 vs 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 vs 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 vs 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 vs 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- 1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark | | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | | |
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | 1088 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 3074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 8.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1443 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
Essentials |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | $109.94 |
| Place in performance rating | 806 | 1447 |
| Price now | $203.37 | $79 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | 17.59 |
Technical info |
| Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
API support |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| Vulkan |
Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
| 3D Vision Pro |
| Mosaic |
| nView Display Management |
| Optimus |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M1000M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs 
AMDFirePro M4100 NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs 
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs AMDFirePro S9300 X2 NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs AMDRadeon 530X NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs AMDRadeon R9 M390 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2025, AskGeek.io