(PDF) G00h) Historical Proof | Will Brinson: Ferguson

Log InSign Up

• Log In
• Sign Up
• more
• • About
  • Press
  • Papers
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center
  • less

Outline

keyboard_arrow_downTitleAbstractdownload

Download Free PDF

Download Free PDFg00h) Historical Proofwill brinson: fergusonvisibility

…

description

17 pages

descriptionSee full PDFdownloadDownload PDF bookmarkSave to LibraryshareShareclose

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

Sign up for freearrow_forwardcheckGet notified about relevant paperscheckSave papers to use in your researchcheckJoin the discussion with peerscheckTrack your impact

Abstract

I have discussed many of the linguistic proofs of Peshitta primacy, which is perhaps the best proof we can have, as it is internal evidence. There is however much external evidence also, such as quotes from Church fathers, and simple (yet little-known) facts about Jesus' time (and language), that also make a strong case for Peshitta primacy.

... Read more

Related papers

Supplementary Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus: A Focused Inquiry into Artifacts, Historical Accounts, and Core ArgumentsPearl Bipin

ResearchGate, 2025

This paper serves as a supplementary document to the author's previous work, titled "A Cumulative Case for Jesus of Nazareth: An Analytical and Evidential Inquiry." 1 While the original paper explored the historical and evidential basis for the life and ministry of Jesus, this inquiry focuses specifically on additional evidence for his resurrection. By examining key artifacts, historical sites, and external historical accounts, this paper seeks to strengthen the cumulative case. It will analyze the evidence presented by various Christian relics, non-Christian historical sources, and the compelling arguments for the resurrection, including the empty tomb and the dramatic transformation of the apostles.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightChristological Claims: A Textual Consideration of John's GospelWesley Huff

The Christian message stands or falls with the concept and doctrine of Christ’s divinity. If one were to boil Christianity to its very basics the doctrine of Christology, the concept of Jesus’ divinity, would be found at its very center. It is the idea and doctrine that divides Christianity from other faith-based groups. The burden of proof then remains on the documents that hold the contents to prove this doctrine, the Greek New Testament (NT). Therefore, in order to validate Jesus’ divinity, a close examination must be done of the NT in order to flush out exactly where one can be certain of not only direct claims of Christ’s divinity but also what the NT authors claim about him. In this paper I will be taking a text critical approach towards the first chapter of John’s Gospel in regard to the bold title and assertion of Θεὸς as it is applied to Jesus and assess this title in 1:1 and 1:18; along with a short note on theological implication. This will be my main goal rather than assessing the origin of the understanding of Jesus as divine (although such details will be mentioned in passing), and will be employing a reasoned eclecticism method, of which is the current accepted view among textual critics.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightTeaching the Historical Jesus Issues and ExegesisJoshua SchwartzdownloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightThe scriptural basis of Jesus as the unique revelation of GodAlbin Thomas

2023

We analyze how the Old Testament prophesies regarding Jesus are fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth. There are so many prophesies but only a few are mentioned in this chapter. Arianism was the earliest heresy that attacked the divinity of Christ and this chapter presents how the Church defended her faith against the heresy.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightSeven Theses on the So-Called Criteria of Authenticity of Historical Jesus ResearchTom Holmén

Revista Catalana de Teologia 33 (2008), pp. 343–376.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightThe Language of the Sayings of Jesus: The Evidence of a Distinctive Greek FeatureJohn A L Lee

Filologia Neotestamentaria 55, 2022

This paper is concerned with a distinctive feature of Greek, the οὐ μή construction, and what it can prove about the original language of the Sayings of Jesus. The state of the general question is briefly summarised, then the feature itself is introduced and its significance explained, drawing on the author's earlier discussions of this feature in the NT and LXX. Full data for its occurrences in the Gospels are presented and analysed. The conclusion is drawn that the presence of this distinctive feature in Sayings from different sources indicates that the original language of at least some Sayings was Greek.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightLessons from the Historical Jesus ResearchMD Litonjua

Who do people say I am?" asks Jesus of his disciples (Mark 8:27). The disciples answer, "John the Baptist; and others say, Elijah; and others one of the prophets." Not satisfied, Jesus asks them, "But who do you say I am?" Peter answers him, "You are the Christ" (Mark 8:27-29). Apparently, the popular perception regarding who Jesus was during his lifetime in firstcentury Palestine was varied. Similarly, a variety of contemporary concerns and personal viewpoints results whether we see Jesus as a man, as God, as peasant, as symbol of human struggle, or as the savior of humanity. Even in scholarly research into the historical Jesus evinces a variety of portrayals of Jesus, his identity and life, his sayings and message, his crucifixion and death. So what is research into the historical Jesus? We differentiate between the Jesus of history, the historical Jesus, the Christ of faith, and the Christ of dogma. The Jesus of history refers to the knowledge of Jesus by his contemporaries. But since no contemporary of Jesus lives, there cannot be any knowledge of the Jesus of history, just as there cannot be any knowledge of the Washington or the Lincoln of history because there are no more living contemporaries of theirs. The historical Jesus refers to the knowledge of Jesus that can be gleaned from historical records, primarily from the Gospels and other historical records of that time, like the writings of Josephus. Thus, there can also be the historical Washington and the historical Lincoln from historical records. The Christ of faith is the portrayal of Jesus as the Messiah, as the Second Person of the Trinity, as the object of faith to believe and believe in. The Christ of dogma is Jesus as taught in the doctrines of the Christian Church, formulated especially

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightThe Jesus Tradition in the Catholic Epistles INTRODUCTIONRoelof AlkemadownloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightEvidence, Miracles, and The Existence of Jesus (Faith and Philosophy 2011)Stephen Law

The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of independent evidence for an historical Jesus, remain sceptical about his existence.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_right“Confirming Scripture through Eyewitness Testimony (2 Pet 1.19a): Resolving a Crux Interpretum,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 43 (2021): 605–624Travis B. Williams

Responding to objections raised against the parousia, the author of 2 Peter seeks to defend the validity of Jesus’ return by pointing to the experience of the apostles at the Transfiguration (1.16–18) and to prophetic scripture (1.19–21). But how these two proofs relate to one another has been a matter of dispute since the earliest days of critical scholarship. Standing behind this disagreement is a difficult grammatical construction involving the comparative adjective βεβαιότερον (2 Pet. 1.19a). This article seeks to bring resolution to the debate through a comprehensive assessment of the force and function of this key term.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightSee full PDFdownloadDownload PDF

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Related papers

A Cumulative Case for Jesus of Nazareth: An Analytical and Evidential InquiryPearl Bipin

ResearchGate, 2025

This paper presents a cumulative case for the historical person of Jesus of Nazareth, commencing from a position of scholarly skepticism and progressively constructing an argument upon verifiable evidence. By examining non-Christian historical accounts, archaeological artifacts, manuscript evidence, and the transformative testimony of early followers, this inquiry moves from establishing a baseline historical existence to evaluating the extraordinary claims presented in the Gospels. The methodology employs a logical, evidence-based progression intended to demonstrate that the traditional Christian understanding of Jesus remains the most coherent and historically robust explanation for the available data.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightHistoricity and Authenticity: Definitions and Methods in Jesus StudiesJonathan Burke

Two issues are central to the historical study of Jesus. One is the examination of evidence for his existence; historicity. The other is the examination of evidence for what he said and did; authenticity. Both of these examinations are typically carried out by applying specific criteria to the available evidence. This article explains the difference between historicity and authenticity, describes the criteria and their application, and assesses strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightOn Getting First Things First: Assessing Claims for the Primacy of ChristMyk Habets

New Blackfriars, 2009

Adopting modal logic the doctrine of the primacy of Christ is defined and defended in relation to the Thomistic -Scotistic debates over the primary and efficient causes of the incarnation. This leads to a defence of the Scotistic thesis and a reserved affirmation for the Scotistic hypothesis that there would have been an incarnation irrespective of the fall. This hypothesis is tested by reference to the work of four recent theologians, Thomas Weinandy O.F.M. cap., Karl Barth, Jürgen Moltmann, and Thomas Torrance. Finally, a sketch describing another possible-world incarnation that builds upon the Scotistic hypothesis is provided.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightPetrine Primacy in Jeromes Commentary on MatthewMarcus Peter

The question of the primacy of Peter and of its present day continuation in the persons of the bishops of Rome stands as probably the most challenging issue with consideration of ecumenical dispute. Even within the Catholic Church, the doctrine of papal primacy has proven to be viewed as a stumbling block, stemming anywhere from ignorance to blatant defiance, “from the medieval struggle between the imperium and sacerdotium to the present day demands for independence from central authority.” This internal struggle, coupled with the admittedly unreasonable protestant backlash against Peter’s primal role both beg further elucidation into the patristic stance behind the Catholic doctrine of Petrine primacy, without the repudiation of his fallen humanity. It is precisely because of this that prudence demands scholars to lend an attentive ear “to the witness of Sacred Scripture and to examine, with a sense of care, the faith of the nascent Church regarding this issue.” In that light, one considers how, across his Commentary on Matthew, St. Jerome attributes a significant number of mentions to St. Peter, implying, per Dr. Thomas Scheck, that “he assigned a sort of primacy to [Peter] among the apostles.” Jerome finds Peter to be a man of intensely burning faith and full of affection for Jesus. He is the one on whom Christ will build his Church; he did not remain in the darkness of denial. Yet on repeated occasions Jerome dismisses the interpretation of Hilary and others who had minimized Peter’s faults.” Thus, this paper will examine how, in his Commentary on Matthew, St. Jerome holistically presents St. Peter in a place of primacy amongst the apostles whilst not negating his weaknesses.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightHistorical Evidence for the Resurrection and the Validation of the Deity of JesusSean HollowaydownloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightThe Historicity of JesusJonathan Burke

The historicity of Jesus is considered an established fact by the majority of professional historians. However, the historical sources typically cited for Jesus’ historicity are not all of equal value. This article describes these sources and provides the scholarly judgment on each.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightEpistemology and Authority: The Problem of the Criterion and the Primacy of ScriptureNicholas Caccese

2018

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightJesus before Pilate: A Discourse Analysis of John 18:33-38Christopher Land

Modeling Biblical Language Selected Papers from the McMaster Divinity College Linguistics Circle, 2016

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightConversational Implicature and The Tok Pisin Bible: A brief evaluation of the translation of three conversational implicatures in the Tok Pisin Gospel of Matthew and translation change proposals for improved truth condition preservation.Jacob S Bullock

Neke The New Zealand Journal of Translation Studies , 2022

In this paper I will be examining and evaluating three conversational implicatures from the gospel of Matthew along with their translations in Tok Pisin, a lingua franca of the country of Papua New Guinea. My purpose in the examination is to evaluate whether the implicatures they contain are likely to communicate the same truth conditional meaning in the translation as in the original. After the evaluation I will show my proposed additions to the translations to ensure that the original truth conditional meanings are preserved. For evaluation of the implicatures I will be utilizing principles from the theory of conversational implicature proposed by Paul Grice. Specifically, I will be referring to his super maxims of quality, quantity, relation and manner and his theory of implicature through violation of these maxims. (Grice 1989)

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightEvidence, Miracles, and the Existence of JesusStephen Law

Faith and Philosophy, 2011

The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus' existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assesseda principle I call the contamination principle-entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of good independent evidence for an historical Jesus, remain sceptical about his existence.

downloadDownload free PDFView PDFchevron_rightkeyboard_arrow_downView more papers

• Explore
• Papers
• Topics

• Features
• Mentions
• Analytics
• PDF Packages
• Advanced Search
• Search Alerts

• Journals
• Academia.edu Journals
• My submissions
• Reviewer Hub
• Why publish with us
• Testimonials

• Company
• About
• Careers
• Press
• Help Center
• Terms
• Privacy
• Copyright
• Content Policy

580 California St., Suite 400San Francisco, CA, 94104© 2026 Academia. All rights reserved