GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 on one side and the MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53 | Cortex-A53 |
| Core name | Kryo 260 Gold, Kryo 260 Silver | Cortex-A53 |
| Family | Snapdragon 600 | Helio G |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | SM6125 | Helio G35 |
| Release date | Q2 2019 | Q3 2020 |
| Lithography | 11 nm LPP | 12 nm 12FFC TSMC |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz |
| High performance cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.3 GHz |
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR3/LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR3 @ 933 MHz, LPDDR4X @ 1600 MHz |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 14.93 GB/s | 14.9 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 |
| GPU shading units | 96 | 64 |
| GPU base clock | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 243.2 GFLOPS | 41.6 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| Drystone MIPS | - | 37,720 DMIPS |
| Max display resolution | - | 2400 x 1080 |
| Video decoding | - | H.264, H.265, HEVC 1080p@30fps |
| Video encoding | - | H.264 1080p@30fps |
| Max camera ISP | - | 13MP + 13MP, 25MP |
| Max video capture | - | 25MP@30fps; 13MP+13MP@30fps |
| Cellular technologies | - | 4G, CDMA2000, EVDO, FDD, TDD, HSPA+ |
| GNSS | - | Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS |
| LTE category | - | Cat-4, Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL |
| Connectivity | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Wi-Fi | - | Wi-Fi 5 (b/g/n/ac) |
| Bluetooth | - | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Radio | - | FM |
| AnTuTu | 175,544 | 104,913 |
| (Android)PassMark CPU Mark | 2,355 | 1,644 |
| (Android)Geekbench 4 single core | 1,507 | 803 |
| (Android)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,494 | 3,830 |
| (Android)Geekbench 5 single core | 307 | 162 |
| (Android)Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,309 | 835 |
| (Android)Geekbench 6 single core | 332 | 216 |
| (Android)Geekbench 6 multi-core | 1,040 | 876 |
| (SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 36.1 GFLOPS | 27.9 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 1,099 pts / W | 766 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score |
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 175,544 |
| MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 104,913 |
The difference is 67%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark - CPU Mark |
| Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 2,355 |
| MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 1,644 |
The difference in performance is 43%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android |
| Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 1,507 5,494 |
| MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 803 3,830 |
In single core, the difference is 88%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 43%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android |
| Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 307 1,309 |
| MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 162 835 |
In single core, the difference is 90%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality. With Android:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android |
| Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 332 1,040 |
| MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 216 876 |
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 Intel EquivalentQualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 AMD EquivalentMediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 Intel EquivalentMediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 AMD Equivalent
Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665:
Crosscall Core-T5Crosscall Core-X5HTC Desire 20 ProMotorola Moto G FastMotorola Moto G PowerMotorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G StylusMotorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G8 PlusMotorola Moto G8 PowerNokia 5.3Oppo A11Oppo A5 (2020)Oppo A52Oppo A72Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A92Realme 5Realme 5iRealme 5sRealme Narzo 20ASony Xperia 10 IIT-Mobile REVVL 4+TCL 10 LiteTCL 10 PlusTCL 10LTCL 10L ProTCL 20SVivo S1 ProVivo U10Vivo V20 SEVivo X50 LiteVivo Y50Vivo Y51 (2020)Vivo Y70Vivo Y9sVsmart Joy 4Xiaomi Mi A3Xiaomi Mi CC9eXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Smartphones with the processor MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35:
Blackview A53 ProDoogee S61Doogee S61 ProInfinix Hot 11 PlayLG W41LG W41 ProLG W41+Micromax In 1bNokia G20OnePlus Nord N20 SEOppo A16Oppo A16kOppo A16sOppo A17Oppo A17kOppo A54sOppo A55Oppo A57 4GOppo A57sRealme C11Realme C12Realme C15Realme C20Realme C21Tecno Spark 7TTecno Spark 8TUlefone Armor 15Ulefone Note 13PUlefone Power Armor 14Wiko Power U20Wiko Power U30Xiaomi Poco C3Xiaomi Poco C31Xiaomi Redmi 9 ActivXiaomi Redmi 9CXiaomi Redmi 9C NFC GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
