Search Results For ' Canh Lề Trang Chẵn Và Trang Lẻ Ngược Nhau Trong ...

Skip page header and navigation Skip to search or filter results

Welcome to our new website. While most COPE resources have moved here, including membership applications, our membership area will look the same for a while as we continue to redevelop our website.

Visit membership area Dismiss message Search COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics Search term Search

Looking for COPE guidance? For best results, use our advanced guidance search

1. Home
2. Search

Filters Skip sidebar content

Filters

Filter by type

Selecting an option will reload the page.

• Case (796)
• Guidance (152)
• News and opinion (95)
• General content (66)
• Topic discussion (39)
• COPE Focus (3)
• Event (3)

See more

Filter by tag

Selecting an option will reload the page.

• COPE news (6)
• Guest contribution (6)
• COPE editorial (4)

• Case

  Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals

  The editors in chief of journal A and journal B, both owned by society C, received a letter from the last ‘senior’ author, also the corresponding author on one of the papers (author D),…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Is this previous publication?

  A manuscript was submitted to our journal and, on running a routine CrossCheck report, we found that it contained a 68% match (over 5000 words) to a report from a funded project by the authors that…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Disagreement between authors and sponsor

  Our journal was contacted by a representative of a company following acceptance of a manuscript that was based on a clinical study sponsored by that company. Upon acceptance, the senior author had…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Seeking retrospective ethics approval

  I received a submission that had asked a series of questions of visitors to a website about a mental health issue. It was reviewed by a senior colleague and myself. While the science was fine we were…

  Type: Case
• Flowchart

  How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process

  Discover key patterns of reviewer activity and best practices to minimise manipulation in the peer review process.

  Type: Guidance
• Case

  Lost raw data

  In a nutshell, if someone has lost their raw data, workup data and laboratory books (so that in effect their data cannot be checked/queried/verified/substantiated) what would be the implications of…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Self-plagiarism of review article

  A reader flagged up that a review article originally published in a journal X in April 2003 had subsequently appeared with a few minor additions and deletions in journal Y (our journal) in July 2004…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Retraction or correction?

  A reader contacted us with evidence that a number of western blots in a manuscript published by us in 2007 had been duplicated from other published papers; in one case, the same gel was duplicated in…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Duplicate publication allegation

  Our journal (journal A) received a complaint from a 'Clare Francis' alerting us to a case of duplicate publication involving our journal and another (journal B). The article in journal A was…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Duplicate publication in possibly four papers

  This case involves four manuscripts. Three of the manuscripts were originally published in another language and then published in our English language journal. There is overlap in the authors who…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Transparency of peer review to co-authors

  An associate editor of one of our journals has asked whether we can configure our online peer review system to restrict access to reviewer correspondence to corresponding authors. His concern is that…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Possible overlapping publications/data

  As editor-in-chief of a journal (journal A), I was contacted by an individual (N) who indicated the following: authors of an article published in journal A were questioned as to the similarity of a…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Inappropriate authorship on students paper

  A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study which was a final year student's project was submitted as an original article to our journal on 30 April 2011. On initial review it was obvious that…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Retraction update?

  I'm seeking advice on how my journal should publish an update to an author requested retraction. In a past issue, our editorial team accepted an author requested retraction; the authors cited errors…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Authorship dispute

  A manuscript was published in journal X, submitted by several co-authors, including one of the editors in chief of journal X, Dr A (the article was handled by another editor in chief at the journal)…

  Type: Case
• Case

  A case of salami slicing

  A reviewer of our journal noticed similarity between a published paper (P1) and a manuscript under review (P2). At the same time, a member of the editorial team noticed similarity between another…

  Type: Case
• Case

  Omitted author

  A case series of 89 patients with a relatively rare condition was accepted for publication by the journal following due process through the peer-review system. The paper was published online within…

  Type: Case
• Case

  A case of plagiarism?

  A paper was published in our journal. A reader contacted us and informed us that the whole of the introduction of the paper was copied directly from another publication. The editor-in-chief suggested…

  Type: Case
• Flowchart

  Plagiarism in a published article

  Steps for editors to take to investigate concerns about suspected data fabrication after publication, and guidance on what steps to take to address it.

  Type: Guidance
• Case

  Ethical concerns about a study involving human subjects

  A manuscript was submitted to our journal describing a study of a new drug. The manuscript had only one author who gave their affiliation as a company that we can find no record of online. It…

  Type: Case

• Current page 1
• Page 2
• Page 3
• Page 4
• Page 5
• Page 6
• Page 7
• Page 8
• Page 9
• Next page
• Last page