Should I Get The Canon EOS R5, EOS R6, Or EOS R? An Extensive ...

Should I Get the Canon EOS R5, EOS R6, or EOS R? An Extensive Comparison The Canon EOS R, shown at the bottom-left in the lead image, came first. The R was Canon's first full-frame MILC (Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera), and the start of the R-series. This model offered a relatively high resolution with a good feature set and solid performance at a reasonable price.

The Canon EOS RP, shown at the bottom-right, came next. A tiny model, the RP is positioned below the R and has a modestly lower resolution and noticeably lower price. The RP is an exceptional value.

This page exists because of the two models that came next, the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS R6, respectively shown at the top-left and top-right. These are both exceptionally-high-performing cameras positioned (and priced) above the EOS R.

Here are the differences between the Canon EOS R6, R5, and R.

Specifications	EOS R5	EOS R6	EOS R
Year Introduced	2020	2020	2018
Megapixels	45.0	20.1	30.4
Pixel Dimensions	8192 x 5464	5472 x 3648	6720 x 4480
Pixel Size	4.39µm	6.56µm	5.36µm
Diffraction-Limited Aperture	f/7.1	f/10.6	f/8.6
ISO Sensitivity	100-51200to L:50, H1: 102400	100-102400to L:50, H1: 204800	100-40000to L:50, H1: 51200, H2: 102400
Image Processor	DIGIC X	DIGIC X	DIGIC 8
Dual Pixel RAW	Yes	No	Yes
Sensor Stabilization	5-Axis IBIS	5-Axis IBIS	No
Movies	8K RAW movie to 30 fps4K movie at up to 120 fps4K time-lapse mode Canon Log 1 / HDR PQ 10bit 4:2:2 internal recordingAll-I / IPB compression 10bit 4:2:2 uncompressed 4K 60p to external recorder	4K movie at up to 60 fps4K time-lapse modeFull HD movies at 120 fpsCanon Log 1 / HDR PQ10bit 4:2:2 internal recordingIPB compression	4K movie (cropped) at 25/24 fpsFull HD movies at 60 fpsHD at 120 fpsCanon Log 110bit 4:2:2 uncompressed 4K to external recorder
Movie Modes	A+, P, Tv, Av, M, C1, C2, C3	A+, M	A+, P, Tv, Av, M, C1, C2, C3
AF Points	1,053 AF Areas covering approx. 100% of the frame5,940 individually selectable AF points with 90% horizontal and 100% vertical coverage	1,053 AF Areas covering approx. 100% of the frame6,072 individually selectable AF points with 90% horizontal and 100% vertical coverage	5,655 points with 88% horizontal and 100% vertical coverage
AF Working Range	EV -6 to 20	EV -6.5 to 20	EV -6 to 18
Subject Detection	Body, Face, Eye, Animal	Body, Face, Eye, Animal	Face, Eye
Focus Bracketing	Yes	Yes	No
EVF	0.5" (127mm) OLED color EVF, 5.76 Million dots	0.5" (127mm) OLED color EVF, 3.69 Million dots	0.5" (127mm) OLED color EVF, 3.69 Million dots
EVF FrameRate	120 fps	120 fps	60 fps
LCD Type	3.15" (8.01cm) Clear View LCD II, approx. 2.10 million dots	2.95" (7.50cm) Clear View LCD II, approx. 1.62 million dots	3.15" (8.01cm) Clear View LCD II, approx. 2.10 million dots
HEIF, HDR PQ	Yes	Yes	No
FPS	12 fps with Servo AF20 fps with Electronic Shutter, and Servo AF	12 fps with Servo AF20 fps with Electronic Shutter, and Servo AF	8 fps fixed AF5 fps with Servo AF
Continuous Frames	350 JPEG, 180 RAW, or 260 CRAW	1,000+ JPEG, 240 RAW, or 1,000+ CRAW	100 JPEG, 47 RAW, 78 C-RAW
Shutter Lag	50ms	55ms
Card Slots	1x CFexpress1x UHS-II SD	2x UHS-II SD	1x UHS-II SD
Control Dials	Main DialQuick Control Dial 1 w/ Mode ButtonQuick Control Dial 2AF Multi-controller (8-Way Joystick)Top panel displayFront Function Button	Main DialQuick Control Dial 1 w/ Mode ButtonQuick Control Dial 2AF Multi-controller (8-Way Joystick)Front Function Button	Multi-function BarQuick Control DialCross-KeysTop Panel Display
Dedicated Rate, Magnify, "Q" Buttons	Yes	Yes	No
Power Switch	Circular w/Lever	Circular w/Lever	Circular
Sound Memo	Yes	No	No
Wireless Features	5Ghz and 2.4Ghz Wi-Fi and BluetoothInternal FTPoptional Wireless transmitter WFT-R10	2.4Ghz Wi-Fi and BluetoothInternal FTP	2.4Ghz Wi-Fi and BluetoothFTP with WFT-E7 II Accessory
PC Terminal	Yes	No	via BG-E22
Computer Interface	USB 3.1 Gen 2	USB 3.1 Gen 2	USB 3.0
HDMI	HDMI micro Type DSimultaneous HDMI Out and Card Writing	HDMI micro Type DHDMI Out or Card Writing	HDMI mini Type CHDMI Out or Card Writing
Remote	N3 (Front)	E3 (Side)	E3 (Side)
Shutter Durability Rating	500,000	300,000	200,000
Supplied Battery	LP-E6NH	LP-E6NH	LP-E6N
Battery Life (CIPA)	LCD 490 shotsEVF 320 shots	LCD 510 shotsEVF 380 shots	370 shots
Grip Geometry	2.7" (68.5mm) Thick2.7" (68.5mm) Thick at Bottom1.55" (39.3mm) Finger Shelf	2.7" (68.5mm) Thick2.7" (68.5mm) Thick at Bottom1.65" (41.8mm) Finger Shelf	2.59" (65.7mm) Thick2.54" (64.5mm) at Bottom1.40" (35.5mm) Finger Shelf
Rattle	Noticeable when Powered Off	Noticeable when Powered Off	No
Dimensions Inches	5.45 x 3.84 x 3.46"(138 x 97.5 x 88.0mm)	5.45 x 3.84 x 3.48"(138 x 97.5 x 88.4mm)	5.35 x 3.87 x 3.32"(135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4mm)
CIPA Weight	26.0 oz (738g)	24.0 oz (680g)	23.3 oz (660g)
List Price	$3,899.00	$2,499.00	$1,799.00
Review	Canon EOS R5	Canon EOS R6	Canon EOS R
Purchase	BUY	BUY	BUY

Again, the original EOS R is a great value, offering good performance and relatively high resolution for a modest price. The 2-years-newer R5 and R6 are significantly more advanced cameras and considerably faster in a number of regards.

One clear differentiator between these cameras is the resolution they provide. It takes no more effort to press the shutter release on a 45 MP camera than it does on a 20 MP camera, and all things equal, the higher resolution image is more desirable. Use the additional resolution to output large, to downsample to even higher quality, or to crop with potentially high resolution remaining.

Not as apparent in the chart are that the R5 and R6 image sensors are significantly faster with less rolling shutter effect, and improved dynamic range (exposure latitude). Here are some dynamic range comparisons:

Canon EOS R5 vs. Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 vs. Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R6 vs. Canon EOS R

The R6's larger pixel sites have a higher SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio), meaning less noise at the pixel level. However, for the comparison to be equal, the higher resolution images must be downsized to the R6 image's pixel dimensions, and with that action, oversampling advantages are realized. At equivalent final image sizes, the R5 and R6 noise levels are about the same.

The pixel-level noise performance is often reflected in the available ISO settings. The R6 has this advantage, and the R trails the R5. That said, you don't want to use any of these cameras (or those from any other manufacturer) at the highest ISO settings made available.

Another aspect that specs do not make clear is the relative sharpness of the images these cameras produce. The R produces softer images than many other Canon cameras when the images are processed using the same settings. Why? I've asked that question multiple times and have received no answers. However, that question has been resolved in the R5 and R6.

Here are some comparisons:

Canon EOS R5 vs. Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 vs. Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R6 vs. Canon EOS R

The R images sharpen nicely with a higher sharpness setting ("2" looks nice). Are the R's RAW images de-tuned slightly, providing more latitude for the photographer to dial in the result they want? Does the R have a stronger low pass filter? Or, is there some other cause for the softer results?

The advantage of "DIGIC X" is not as easy to comprehend as, say, the number of megapixels on the imaging sensor, but this processor's extreme speed makes complex in-camera calculations possible, with improved AF performance and image quality being two advantages. The DIGIC X processor in the R5 and R6 is significantly more powerful than the DIGIC 8 processor in the R.

The R6 does not feature Canon Dual Pixel RAW capture where two signals are captured for each pixel. Portrait Relighting is featured on the R5.

The IBIS (In Body Image Stabilization) is a tremendous advantage held by the R5 and R6 models. These two cameras effectively upgrade all of the lenses in your kit, with better image quality being realized. IBIS is a huge advantage for video, decreasing the need for bulky and expensive gimbals in certain situations. With IBIS, the R5 and R6 have a noticeable rattle when powered off (don't worry about this).

The R5's 8K uncropped video capability (including RAW) is awesome, and the R6 enjoys a strong movie capability advantage over the R, including uncropped 4K vs. cropped 4K (1.75x). The R5 and R6 provide Dual Pixel CMOS AF II tracking with every resolution/framerate, but the R does not get AF tracking with high framerate (720p) capture. An R5 advantage is that it goes to 120 fps in 4K while the R6 has FHD 120 fps.

The R6 has only two movie modes, and the R5 has an improved movie setting menu option.

All three of these cameras can autofocus in crazy-low light levels, but the R6 has a slight advantage. The R5 and R6 have some advantage over the R when focusing in very bright light levels.

The EOS R's Dual Pixel CMOS AF system, including eye and face detection, performs excellently, but the R5 and R6's Dual Pixel CMOS II AF system takes subject detection and tracking capabilities to another level, including animal tracking. The R5 and R6 AF systems handle challenging circumstances amazingly well.

The R5 and R6 have a focus bracketing feature missing on the R (this feature first arrived on the RP).

The R5's considerably higher resolution EVF is a significant advantage, as is its higher resolution rear LCD. The R5 and R6 have a much faster refresh rate available, helping you follow a moving subject. Especially notable is that the R5 and R6 have less EVF blackout, dramatically helping you track a moving subject. The diopter dial has moved to the right side of the viewfinder on the R5 and R6 where it is easier to access. The R5 and R6 have a modified eyecup shape (all are non-removable).

Also aiding in capturing a perfect action shot is the R5 and R6's extremely fast frame rates, rates that leave the R far behind.

For some, having dual memory card slots is a big advantage for the R5 and R6 over the R. Differentiating between the R5 and R6 is that one of the R5's slots is the faster CFexpress format. For those not needing the speed of CFexpress, the R6's dual card slots sharing the same UHS-II SD format could be an advantage.

The additional controls and buttons, including a joystick replacing the R's Multi-Function Bar and ISO adjustment instantly available on the top quick control dial, along with the revised power switch design on the R5 and R6 make these cameras easier to use than the R. The EOS R and R5 have top LCDs while the R6 does not. The R5 and R6's top-right three buttons on the back have a horizontal layout to provide space for the larger dual memory card slot door — especially the AF-ON button is easier to reach in the updated layout. The R5 and R6 have an additional configurable button (depth of field preview by default) on the front. If you need the sound memo feature or a PC terminal, the R5 is your only choice.

The R5 has the most advanced built-in Wi-Fi and also has the most advanced wireless file transmitter available. The R6 has more advanced built-in Wi-Fi than the R, but it does not have a wireless file transmitter option.

The R5 and R6 have faster USB ports than the R, and the R5 and R6 have HDMI micro Type D ports vs. the R's HDMI mini Type C port. The R5 has an N3-type remote release port vs. E3 in the R6 and R. The R5 has a more durable shutter, rated at 500,000 actuations vs. 300,000 and 200,000.

While the R5 and R6 arrive with a higher capacity battery, that battery is compatible with the EOS R and its charger, meaning this difference is easy to equalize. That 14% higher capacity battery helps the battery life ratings with the R5 and R6 showing big improvements (when using the LCD). Remember that experienced battery life is often twice the rated value, and far higher when capturing high-speed bursts of images. These three cameras are essentially the same size and weight.

The EOS R5 and R6 have an enhanced grip geometry, featuring a larger shelf above the fingers and a thicker grip base, both making the newer models noticeably easier to hold onto.

For a significant percentage of photographers, the primary decision factor between these cameras will be the price. A safe recommendation is to buy the highest-priced model you can afford. The EOS R is a bargain. The EOS R6 is a considerably faster and better camera, and the EOS R5 is the flagship model, unsurpassed in the Canon lineup. If your funds can take you to this level, the R5 is the camera you want.

Simplifying the R5 vs. R6 comparison:

R6 Advantages Over the R5

• ISO 100-102400, Expandable to 204800 vs. ISO 100-51200, Expandable to 102400
• Greater AF Working Range — EV -6.5 to 20 vs. EV -6.0 to 20
• Slightly More Selectable AF Points — 6,072 vs. 5,940
• Lower Price

The R6 advantages list is a short one, and most advantages are very slight. However, the "Lower Price" bullet is a powerful one.

Did I miss any differences? Let me know! That the R5 has a "BE CAREFUL HOT" warning label inside the memory card door does not count. The R6 lock button being raised modestly might count a tiny amount.

Use the site's tools to create specific comparisons:

Specifications Comparisons

Canon EOS R5 Compared to the Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R5 Compared to the Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 Compared to the Canon EOS 5Ds and 5Ds R Canon EOS R5 Compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS R6 Compared to the Canon EOS R Canon EOS R6 Compared to the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III

Not all differences show up in the specifications, but the visual comparison tool can fill in many of the missing differences:

Visual Comparisons

Canon EOS R5 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R5 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS 5Ds and 5Ds R Canon EOS R5 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS R6 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS R Canon EOS R6 Visual Comparison with the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III

Review Pages

Note that the R5 and R6 review pages continue to be updated with additional information.

Canon EOS R5 | Canon EOS R6 | Canon EOS R

Order Now

Canon EOS R5 | Canon EOS R6 | Canon EOS R

Please share this page!