PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 632 vs Helio G35 – what's better? Snapdragon 632 vs Helio G35
VS
Snapdragon 632 Helio G35
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (with Adreno 506 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G35 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 632
14 Helio G35
12 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 632
4 Helio G35
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 632
68 Helio G35
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 632
21 Helio G35
22 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
- Performs 60% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 27%) AnTuTu 10 score – 183K vs 144K
- Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
- Supports 85% higher memory bandwidth (13.9 against 7.5 GB/s)
- 28% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 1800 MHz)
- Has a smaller size transistor (12 versus 14 nm)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 632
vs Helio G35
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 632
+27% 183418 Helio G35
144387 | CPU | 80526 | 52240 |
| GPU | 17422 | 19256 |
| Memory | 44195 | 40204 |
| UX | 41275 | 32687 |
| Total score | 183418 | 144387 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [31 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 632
+56% 295 Helio G35
189 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 632
+28% 1037 Helio G35
810 | Asset compression | 72.6 MB/sec | 63.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 30.4 pages/sec | 25.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 45.7 Mpixels/sec | 36.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 12.2 images/sec | 10.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 36.8 Mpixels/sec | 30 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 1.41 images/sec | 0.87 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 7.79 images/sec | 7.57 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.85 Mpixels/sec | 1.65 Mpixels/sec |
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 632
134 Helio G35
n/a | Graphics test | 1 FPS | - |
| Score | 134 | - |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | - | 23 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 29 FPS [Medium] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 30 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 43 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 29 FPS [Low] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Poco C3 720 x 1600 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 632 and Helio G35
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A734x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 2.2 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 506 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | Adreno 500 | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) |
| GPU frequency | 725 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 4 |
| Shading units | 48 | 8 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 69.6 Gigaflops | 43.5 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| DirectX version | 11 | - |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 546 | No |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 933 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 1x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 7.5 Gb/s | 13.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 1900 x 1200 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X9 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | June 2018 | June 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Low end |
| Model number | SDM632 | MT6765G |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site | MediaTek Helio G35 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 632
402 (66.4%) Helio G35
203 (33.6%) Vote Total votes:
605 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G36
2. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G85
3. MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc T606 (5)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G35 and Snapdragon 632, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >