PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 632 – what's better? Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 632
VS
Snapdragon 665 Snapdragon 632
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Snapdragon 632 (Adreno 506). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (1)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 665
16 Snapdragon 632
14 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 665
6 Snapdragon 632
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 665
77 Snapdragon 632
68 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 665
25 Snapdragon 632
21 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
- Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations
- Supports 99% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 7.5 GB/s)
- Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 14 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~31%)
- Shows better (up to 29%) AnTuTu 10 score – 235K vs 183K
- 11% higher CPU clock speed (2000 vs 1800 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 665
vs Snapdragon 632
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 665
+29% 235828 Snapdragon 632
183418 | CPU | 89694 | 80526 |
| GPU | 34389 | 17422 |
| Memory | 53247 | 44195 |
| UX | 58498 | 41275 |
| Total score | 235828 | 183418 |
| Samples | [38 tests] | [5 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 665
+14% 335 Snapdragon 632
295 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 665
+12% 1166 Snapdragon 632
1037 | Asset compression | 74.6 MB/sec | 72.6 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 39.1 pages/sec | 30.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 49.3 Mpixels/sec | 45.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 14.3 images/sec | 12.2 images/sec |
| HDR | 44.3 Mpixels/sec | 36.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 1.7 images/sec | 1.41 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 9.53 images/sec | 7.79 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.22 Mpixels/sec | 1.85 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 665
466 Snapdragon 632
n/a 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 665
+63% 219 Snapdragon 632
134 | Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| Score | 219 | 134 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 29 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 28 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 53 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 57 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS [High] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 1080 x 2340 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 665 and Snapdragon 632
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A734x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 11 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion | 2 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 610 | Adreno 506 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 1 |
| Shading units | 128 | 48 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 Gigaflops | 69.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 11 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 546 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 1x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gb/s | 7.5 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 1900 x 1200 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X12 | X9 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
Info
| Announced | April 2019 | June 2018 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6125 | SDM632 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 665
202 (78.3%) Snapdragon 632
56 (21.7%) Vote Total votes:
258 Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (9)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (3)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 632 and Snapdragon 665, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
Jason March 14, 2022 at 04:15 PM Pls, check your math on the Adreno 610 vs Adreno 506 flops. The only explanation is 610 has more than 96 alus. +6 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >