PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662 – what's better? Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662
VS
Snapdragon 665 Snapdragon 662
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (8)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 665
16 Snapdragon 662
16 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 665
6 Snapdragon 662
6 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 665
77 Snapdragon 662
78 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 665
25 Snapdragon 662
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
- Supports 7% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 13.9 GB/s)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 10 score – 247K vs 235K
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 665
vs Snapdragon 662
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 665
235828 Snapdragon 662
+5% 247842 | CPU | 89694 | 88919 |
| GPU | 34389 | 33997 |
| Memory | 53247 | 63810 |
| UX | 58498 | 61116 |
| Total score | 235828 | 247842 |
| Samples | [38 tests] | [50 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 665
335 Snapdragon 662
+1% 339 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 665
1166 Snapdragon 662
+4% 1208 | Asset compression | 74.6 MB/sec | 78 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 39.1 pages/sec | 41 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 49.3 Mpixels/sec | 51.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 14.3 images/sec | 14.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 44.3 Mpixels/sec | 45.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 1.7 images/sec | 1.85 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 9.53 images/sec | 10.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.22 Mpixels/sec | 2.2 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 665
466 Snapdragon 662
+6% 493 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 665
219 Snapdragon 662
+75% 384 | Stability | 98% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 219 | 384 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 29 FPS [Low] | 28 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 28 FPS [Ultra] | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] | 26 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 53 FPS [Low] | 54 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 57 FPS [Medium] | 59 FPS [Medium] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS [High] | 30 FPS [High] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 1080 x 2340 | Xiaomi Poco M3 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 665 and Snapdragon 662
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 11 nanometers | 11 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 1.75 billion | 1.75 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 4 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 1 |
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 Gigaflops | 243.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 683 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gb/s | 13.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X12 | X11 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | April 2019 | January 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6125 | SM615 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 665
2731 (32.4%) Snapdragon 662
5687 (67.6%) Vote Total votes:
8418 Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio G99
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (9)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (3)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Snapdragon 665, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
H.L May 23, 2021 at 09:14 AM 662 looks to be a ‘tune’ on the 665 +44 Reply Cody January 14, 2021 at 04:46 PM Saying they're exactly the same when one has half the download speed is an odd thing to do. +102 Reply Quetzalcoatlus September 22, 2024 at 04:18 AM Firet of all, it's not half, it's 53℅ more, not the same thing. Second of all, it's a theoretical limit. Most networks don't even get you clise to those limita so that's pretty useless most of the time unless you have a very good network. +2 Reply jebeno January 9, 2021 at 05:24 PM In my point of view there is one critical difference in favor of the 665: the download speed. The download speed of the 665 is 600 Mbps vs 390 Mpbs for the 662. So the download speed of the 665 is 53% faster than the speed of the 662. This is a big difference for such a critical feature. +144 Reply hey June 7, 2021 at 04:35 AM That is the highest possible download speed....theoretically. To actually have a 600mbps download speed means to be able to download pubg in 3.5 seconds!! That is exactly why theory can't be mixed with real life performance +20 Reply Zeref June 14, 2021 at 05:46 PM hey, 600mbps is not actually 600MB. Both are different. when they say 600mbps we usually divide the same with 8, so 600/8 = 75MB per sec. With that you can download the PUBG with 20 seconds. Which is also a theoretical value. +30 Reply Amir December 6, 2020 at 09:53 PM The limited clock speed makes the big.LITTLE technology almost useless with only 200MHz difference for heavy tasks. I think this is just a temporary solution for overheating problems. +102 Reply Oscar August 16, 2020 at 04:51 PM So basically they're the same chip except the 662 has a slightly slower NPU and 4G modem, has newer Bluetooth 5.1 and virtually identical real-world performance while costing less than the 665. +588 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >