PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 678 vs Helio G88 – what's better? Snapdragon 678 vs Helio G88

VS

Snapdragon 678 Helio G88
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 (with Adreno 612 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G88 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 678
23 Helio G88
18 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 678
8 Helio G88
7 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 678
78 Helio G88
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 678
29 Helio G88
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
- Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 26%) AnTuTu 10 score – 337K vs 268K
- 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
- Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 12 nm)
- Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 13.41 GB/s)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G88
- Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 678
vs Helio G88
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 678
+26% 337557 Helio G88
268860 | CPU | 117977 | 90211 |
| GPU | 45372 | 40709 |
| Memory | 79421 | 63167 |
| UX | 94787 | 74773 |
| Total score | 337557 | 268860 |
| Samples | [22 tests] | [112 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 678
+60% 680 Helio G88
425 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 678
+15% 1556 Helio G88
1355 | Asset compression | 81.7 MB/sec | 73.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 41.4 pages/sec | 39.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 54.7 Mpixels/sec | 50.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 31.5 images/sec | 25.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 47.5 Mpixels/sec | 42 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 4.56 images/sec | 3.26 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 11.3 images/sec | 11.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.12 Mpixels/sec | 2.13 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 678
548 Helio G88
+106% 1130 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 678
481 Helio G88
+54% 743 | Stability | 99% | - |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 481 | 743 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 41 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 40 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Fortnite | 24 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 54 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Genshin Impact | 14 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 48 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 1080 x 2400 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 678 and Helio G88
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | - |
| Process | 11 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 6 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 612 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 895 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 229.1 Gigaflops | 96 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 685 | MediaTek APU |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gb/s | 13.41 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X12 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | December 2020 | June 2021 |
| Class | Mid range | Low end |
| Model number | SM6150-AC | MT6769H |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 official site | MediaTek Helio G88 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 678
1368 (76.4%) Helio G88
423 (23.6%) Vote Total votes:
1791 Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (1)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (1)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6)
4. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G91 (3)
5. MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (5)
6. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (5)
7. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G99
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G88 and Snapdragon 678, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >