PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 680 vs Helio G88 – what's better? Snapdragon 680 vs Helio G88
VS
Snapdragon 680 Helio G88
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G88 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (3)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 680
19 Helio G88
18 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 680
7 Helio G88
7 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 680
88 Helio G88
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 680
29 Helio G88
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
- Performs 3x better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
- Supports 27% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 13.41 GB/s)
- 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz)
- Higher GPU frequency (~11%)
- Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 10 score – 309K vs 269K
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 680
vs Helio G88
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 680
+15% 309063 Helio G88
269916 | CPU | 109202 | 90768 |
| GPU | 39815 | 36045 |
| Memory | 89604 | 70282 |
| UX | 70442 | 72821 |
| Total score | 309063 | 269916 |
| Samples | [144 tests] | [83 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 680
412 Helio G88
+3% 425 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 680
+7% 1444 Helio G88
1355 | Asset compression | 90 MB/sec | 73.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 46.2 pages/sec | 39.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 64.4 Mpixels/sec | 50.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 16.3 images/sec | 25.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 51.6 Mpixels/sec | 42 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.06 images/sec | 3.26 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 11.7 images/sec | 11.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.52 Mpixels/sec | 2.13 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 680
575 Helio G88
+97% 1130 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 680
588 Helio G88
+26% 743 | Graphics test | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 588 | 743 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 59 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Low] | - |
| Fortnite | 23 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 65 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 62 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Genshin Impact | 26 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 54 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 1080 x 2400 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 680 and Helio G88
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 1114 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 284 Gigaflops | 96 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X11 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 390 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | October 2021 | June 2021 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | SM6225 | MT6769H |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site | MediaTek Helio G88 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 680
5103 (74.1%) Helio G88
1780 (25.9%) Vote Total votes:
6883 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G99
2. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G91
3. MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio G85
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G85
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G99
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G91
Compare other chipsets (170+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G88 and Snapdragon 680, or ask any questions 
Phenom July 8, 2023 at 06:03 AM This review cracks me up, it's clear the snapdragon 680 is better but it's labeled as a "low-end chip" but the worse g88 is "mid-range" 😂 +362 Reply Kano May 16, 2023 at 08:16 AM The biggest upside to the SD680 is the phenomenal battery life. +165 Reply RKDreal March 9, 2023 at 05:51 PM SMD 680 is great for multitasking and other tasks, but it's unplayable when gaming. It only gives 2 to 10 FPS on a 6GB RAM Redmi 10 (in Free Fire training grounds). I have a Lava phone with Unisoc 9863A and 2GB RAM, but it gives 31 FPS (in Free Fire training grounds). While 680 has good performance, it can't be used for gaming. At first, it may seem smooth, but after 2 minutes it starts to drop FPS. I wouldn't recommend buying an SMD 680 phone if you want to game. +166 Reply Phenom March 17, 2023 at 08:00 AM That's not true, I play Apex legends Mobile at 40 fps, smooth and normal graphics with no frame drops, what the heck do you mean by 2 - 10 fps in freefire?!?. I used to play 60 fps and ultra graphics in freefire. +340 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >