Snapdragon 765G Vs Dimensity 800U: Tests And Benchmarks

NanoReview Logo SmartphonesCompare LaptopsCompare CPUGPUSoC Ranking Beta Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U – what's better? Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U Snapdragon 765G VS Dimensity 800U Snapdragon 765G Dimensity 800U

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 800U (Mali-G57 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v10
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (2)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 765G 27 Dimensity 800U 27 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 765G 14 Dimensity 800U 14 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 765G 86 Dimensity 800U 85 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 765G 35 Dimensity 800U 33

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • Performs 76% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 765G +1% 437036 Dimensity 800U 433106
CPU 142605 143854
GPU 91935 91001
Memory 94475 84706
UX 108048 113545
Total score 437036 433106
Samples [21 tests] [13 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 765G +6% 797 Dimensity 800U 752 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 765G 1844 Dimensity 800U 1836
Asset compression 89.6 MB/sec 98.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 40.5 pages/sec 49.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 57.6 Mpixels/sec 56.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37.7 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 56 Mpixels/sec 59.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.58 images/sec 5.26 images/sec
Photo processing 18.8 images/sec 11 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.51 Mpixels/sec 2.64 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 765G 1134 Dimensity 800U +56% 1774 Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 765G 1666 Dimensity 800U 1663
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 9 FPS 9 FPS
Score 1666 1663

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS [High] 44 FPS [Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS [Ultra] 47 FPS [Medium]
Fortnite 29 FPS [Medium] 28 FPS [Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS [Low] 39 FPS [Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 35 FPS [Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 55 FPS [Ultra] 55 FPS [Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 1080 x 2400 Oppo Realme 7 5G 1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Dimensity 800U

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 620 Mali-G57 MP3
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 2 3
Shading units 192 64
Total shaders 384 192
FLOPS 576 Gigaflops 326.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 696 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 - H.264 - H.265 - VP9
Audio codecs - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3

Connectivity

Modem X52 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2019 August 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7250-AB MT6853T
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site MediaTek Dimensity 800U official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 765G 1771 (29%) Dimensity 800U 4326 (71%) Vote Total votes: 6097

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G99 4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Compare other chipsets (170+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800U and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions Avatar Shetani March 28, 2023 at 03:05 PM I'm just surprised to see MTK with over 70% votes with a very similar performance. +13 Reply Avatar Shlddnmy May 18, 2021 at 12:07 AM The only problem of mediatek CPU is Battery Life. +170 Reply Avatar DDDD November 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM The only problem of Shitdragon CPU is Battery Life. +21 Reply Avatar Hater January 13, 2022 at 12:01 PM DDDD, Imagine getting butthurt over a simple criticism that is true at the time of the comment. Listen. You are not the creator of MediaTek. No one but you cares about your situation. Snapdragon is worse. So what? Mediatek is worse. So what? Neither matters. You're being BUTT HURT over insecurity that you're forced to use MediaTek in your life because of your circumstances. Both are good, stop insulting products. +12 Reply Name Message Send Send Promotion Comparisons
  • Smartphones
  • Tablets
  • Laptops
  • CPU
  • Graphics Cards
  • SoC
Rankings
  • Desktop Processors
  • Laptop Processors
  • Mobile SoC
  • Desktop GPU
  • Laptop GPU
  • Contact Us
EnglishРусский > >

Từ khóa » Chip Mtk 800u