PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U – what's better? Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800U
VS
Snapdragon 765G Dimensity 800U
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 800U (Mali-G57 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (5)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 765G
27 Dimensity 800U
27 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 765G
14 Dimensity 800U
14 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 765G
86 Dimensity 800U
85 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 765G
35 Dimensity 800U
33 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
- Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 800U
- Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 765G
vs Dimensity 800U
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 765G
+1% 437036 Dimensity 800U
433106 | CPU | 142605 | 143854 |
| GPU | 91935 | 91001 |
| Memory | 94475 | 84706 |
| UX | 108048 | 113545 |
| Total score | 437036 | 433106 |
| Samples | [27 tests] | [13 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 765G
+6% 797 Dimensity 800U
752 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 765G
1844 Dimensity 800U
1836 | Asset compression | 89.6 MB/sec | 98.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 40.5 pages/sec | 49.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 57.6 Mpixels/sec | 56.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 37.7 images/sec | 36.8 images/sec |
| HDR | 56 Mpixels/sec | 59.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 5.58 images/sec | 5.26 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 18.8 images/sec | 11 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.51 Mpixels/sec | 2.64 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 765G
1134 Dimensity 800U
+56% 1774 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 765G
1666 Dimensity 800U
1663 | Stability | 99% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Score | 1666 | 1663 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 57 FPS [High] | 44 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 FPS [Ultra] | 47 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Medium] | 28 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 67 FPS [Low] | 39 FPS [Ultra] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 51 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | - | 35 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 55 FPS [Ultra] | 55 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 1080 x 2400 | Oppo Realme 7 5G 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Dimensity 800U
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 620 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 192 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 384 | 96 |
| FLOPS | 480 Gigaflops | 163.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 696 | MediaTek APU 3.0 |
| NPU theoretical performance | - | 2.4 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gb/s | 17.07 Gb/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 3200 x 1800 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | X52 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 3700 Mbps | Up to 2770 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 Mbps | Up to 1250 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | December 2019 | August 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM7250-AB | MT6853T |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site | MediaTek Dimensity 800U official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 765G
1785 (29.1%) Dimensity 800U
4343 (70.9%) Vote Total votes:
6128 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (4)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G99
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800U and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
jenkins from europe April 25, 2025 at 11:49 AM I use my 800U on my phone, which is now 3 years old, and I have a lot of apps, like over 90. I tweaked the battery usage settings, even in developer options, and I managed to make the battery last longer. For example, before I did optimization, it used 2-3% per hour when not used (sleep mode, not turned off), and now, after I did optimizations, it uses 1% per hour when in sleep mode. I think that every phone can use less battery if you optimize the battery usage for every app you downloaded. I also turned off Google diagnostics information collection and sending, which eats battery, and I deleted the AD-ID on my Google account. I think that also lowers battery usage because Google won't collect and send data of my phone usage to every single company, lol. I hope this advice helps. 0 Reply Shetani March 28, 2023 at 03:05 PM I'm just surprised to see MTK with over 70% votes with a very similar performance. +16 Reply Shlddnmy May 18, 2021 at 12:07 AM The only problem of mediatek CPU is Battery Life. +174 Reply DDDD November 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM The only problem of Shitdragon CPU is Battery Life. +22 Reply Hater January 13, 2022 at 12:01 PM DDDD, Imagine getting butthurt over a simple criticism that is true at the time of the comment. Listen. You are not the creator of MediaTek. No one but you cares about your situation. Snapdragon is worse. So what? Mediatek is worse. So what? Neither matters. You're being BUTT HURT over insecurity that you're forced to use MediaTek in your life because of your circumstances. Both are good, stop insulting products. +15 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >