PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 765G vs Snapdragon 750G – what's better? Snapdragon 765G vs Snapdragon 750G
VS
Snapdragon 765G Snapdragon 750G
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and Snapdragon 750G (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (5)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 765G
27 Snapdragon 750G
28 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 765G
14 Snapdragon 750G
12 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 765G
86 Snapdragon 750G
84 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 765G
35 Snapdragon 750G
34 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
- Performs 17% better in floating-point computations
- 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
- Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
- Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 10 score – 437K vs 396K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
- Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 765G
vs Snapdragon 750G
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 765G
+10% 437036 Snapdragon 750G
396590 | CPU | 142605 | 130047 |
| GPU | 91935 | 76323 |
| Memory | 94475 | 83905 |
| UX | 108048 | 106315 |
| Total score | 437036 | 396590 |
| Samples | [27 tests] | [24 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 765G
797 Snapdragon 750G
+10% 875 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 765G
1844 Snapdragon 750G
+14% 2095 | Asset compression | 89.6 MB/sec | 101.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 40.5 pages/sec | 54.8 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 57.6 Mpixels/sec | 72.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 37.7 images/sec | 41.1 images/sec |
| HDR | 56 Mpixels/sec | 64.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 5.58 images/sec | 6.18 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 18.8 images/sec | 20.6 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.51 Mpixels/sec | 2.89 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 765G
1134 Snapdragon 750G
1139 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 765G
+52% 1666 Snapdragon 750G
1095 | Stability | 99% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| Score | 1666 | 1095 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 57 FPS [High] | 58 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 FPS [Ultra] | 37 FPS [High] |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Medium] | 28 FPS [Medium] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 67 FPS [Low] | 61 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 55 FPS [Ultra] | 56 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 1080 x 2400 | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Snapdragon 750G
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L3 cache | - | 3 MB |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 8 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 192 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 384 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 480 Gigaflops | 409.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 696 | Hexagon 694 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gb/s | 17 Gb/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3200 x 1800 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X52 | X52 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 3700 Mbps | Up to 3700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 Mbps | Up to 1600 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2019 | September 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM7250-AB | SM7225 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 765G
1903 (31.6%) Snapdragon 750G
4128 (68.4%) Vote Total votes:
6031 Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G99 (1)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 1280 (7)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (9)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G99
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (4)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
user October 26, 2020 at 07:46 PM I don't understand why they need to make the 750g as well when it's not that much different +153 Reply randodude January 8, 2021 at 05:46 PM Because 750 provides similar performance to 765G at a lower price point that's why. +50 Reply mom March 9, 2021 at 01:55 PM I think It's optional(depends on the consumer needs). 750G its more to daily driver use and 765G its more like to gaming performances +29 Reply GYmm April 14, 2021 at 07:07 PM 765G can't handle 108MP camera, mostly phone used today. And dual Kyro Gold is cheaper and better perform than single Kyro Prime +8 Reply Wews May 5, 2021 at 07:37 AM GYmm, like they say, sd 765g is for gaming while sd 750g is for daily driver +20 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >