PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 845 vs Snapdragon 765G – what's better? Snapdragon 845 vs Snapdragon 765G
VS
Snapdragon 845 Snapdragon 765G
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (with Adreno 630 graphics) and Snapdragon 765G (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (4)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Snapdragon 845
27 Snapdragon 765G
27 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Snapdragon 845
19 Snapdragon 765G
14 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Snapdragon 845
73 Snapdragon 765G
86 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Snapdragon 845
35 Snapdragon 765G
35 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
- Supports 75% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 17 GB/s)
- Performs 51% better in floating-point computations
- 17% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2400 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 10 score – 463K vs 437K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
- Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Snapdragon 845
vs Snapdragon 765G
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Snapdragon 845
+6% 463819 Snapdragon 765G
437036 | CPU | 131371 | 142605 |
| GPU | 139729 | 91935 |
| Memory | 88619 | 94475 |
| UX | 104100 | 108048 |
| Total score | 463819 | 437036 |
| Samples | [64 tests] | [27 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Snapdragon 845
564 Snapdragon 765G
+41% 797 Multi-Core Score Snapdragon 845
+12% 2074 Snapdragon 765G
1844 | Asset compression | 104.1 MB/sec | 89.6 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 68.5 pages/sec | 40.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 74.9 Mpixels/sec | 57.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 18.1 images/sec | 37.7 images/sec |
| HDR | 71.5 Mpixels/sec | 56 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 6.01 images/sec | 5.58 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 20.5 images/sec | 18.8 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 3.02 Mpixels/sec | 2.51 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Snapdragon 845
+71% 1941 Snapdragon 765G
1134 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Snapdragon 845
1663 Snapdragon 765G
1666 | Stability | 94% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Score | 1663 | 1666 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | 53 FPS [Ultra] | 57 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 55 FPS [High] | 38 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 28 FPS [Ultra] | 29 FPS [Medium] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 48 FPS [High] | 67 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 56 FPS [Ultra] | 55 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Xiaomi Pocophone F1 1080 x 2246 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 845 and Snapdragon 765G
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Gold (Cortex-A75)4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 385 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | - |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | - |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 9 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 630 | Adreno 620 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 710 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 256 | 192 |
| Total shaders | 512 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 727 Gigaflops | 480 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 685 | Hexagon 696 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 29.8 Gb/s | 17 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3200 x 1800 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP | 1x 192MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X20 | X52 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 1200 Mbps | Up to 3700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 1600 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2017 | December 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | SDM845 | SM7250-AB |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 845
2531 (65%) Snapdragon 765G
1365 (35%) Vote Total votes:
3896 Related Comparisons
1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G99
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (4)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (11)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (3)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 765G and Snapdragon 845, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
Inam October 22, 2025 at 07:44 PM Many people have faced issues in SD 845 like audio delay and its not good for video editing 0 Reply Robert April 4, 2024 at 05:18 PM To be honest, they are good in their own way. The Snapdragon 765g are good in terms of daily use and efficiency. It's a newer chip so these are the priorities of newer midranges. I have the Pixel 3 (SD845) and 5 (SD765g) and the 5 feels faster in regular use (though the 8GB does help A LOT). T he battery is amazing and the phone rarely heats up. The part where the Snapdragon 845 wins is gaming. Mainly because it is a flagship processor that puts more focus on raw power and GPU power (as you can tell based on Antutu test). In gaming, the frame rates are higher in the Pixel 3 and video/photo processing is faster. Overall, the newer midrange chip is better for most people. +11 Reply Ronaldo SUUIII December 7, 2022 at 07:39 PM I have a Samsung s9+ and LG velvet 5g the LG gets way better battery life probably because it's newer with less battery degradation. the LG also doesn't get hot even under load. the S9+ could run games at medium 60fps but the LG can only do 30 for some reason. the benchmarks say the LG should be better... In pixel gun 3d and PUBG, the S9+ can run both at 60fps (smooth and extreme fps for PUBG). but the LG can only do 45 fps on PUBG and has frequent frame drops from 60 on Pixel Gun 3d... the benchmarks don't show the whole picture i guess +19 Reply Results45 May 24, 2022 at 07:17 AM The 845 marked the period in smartphone history when the 3.5mm audio jack started to die when Apple released the iPhone 8 (after the jack's first disappearance in the iPhone 7) without it that same fall in 2017. The 845 is also best remembered for powering the Pocophone F1 which not only included a headphone jack but was objectively the "flagship killer of the year". The 765G on the other hand will likely be remembered for powering the last Pixel phone ~ the 5a ~ with a headphone jack -- if Google decides not to not to ever include it in their phones again. Both are awesome SoCs that perform very comparably with the 765G sporting more up-to-date I/O and better energy efficiency. +23 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >