Full text links CiteDisplay options Display options Format AbstractPubMedPMID
Abstract
Recent studies recognize a vast diversity of noncoding RNAs with largely unknown functions, but few have examined interspersed repeat sequences, which constitute almost half our genome. RNA hybridization in situ using C0T-1 (highly repeated) DNA probes detects surprisingly abundant euchromatin-associated RNA comprised predominantly of repeat sequences (C0T-1 RNA), including LINE-1. C0T-1-hybridizing RNA strictly localizes to the interphase chromosome territory in cis and remains stably associated with the chromosome territory following prolonged transcriptional inhibition. The C0T-1 RNA territory resists mechanical disruption and fractionates with the nonchromatin scaffold but can be experimentally released. Loss of repeat-rich, stable nuclear RNAs from euchromatin corresponds to aberrant chromatin distribution and condensation. C0T-1 RNA has several properties similar to XIST chromosomal RNA but is excluded from chromatin condensed by XIST. These findings impact two "black boxes" of genome science: the poorly understood diversity of noncoding RNA and the unexplained abundance of repetitive elements.
Figure 1. CoT-1 RNA is expressed in all mammalian cells examined
All blue signals are…
Figure 1. CoT-1 RNA is expressed in all mammalian cells examined All blue signals are DAPI DNA. CoT-1 RNA is expressed in 100% of interphase cells. e.g. A) HeLa (M=metaphase), B) NIH3T3. Inserts: CoT-1 RNA exclusion from chromocenters (inset arrows) of indicated cell (arrow). C) Human ES cells and D) frozen human tissue sections. D–E) Linescan across nuclei shows CoT-1 RNA absence from peripheral heterochromatic compartment (yellow zones). F–G) XIST RNA (arrow) paints the inactive X chr in female cells, while CoT-1 RNA is silenced. (See Fig S1 & Table S1). Scale bar 5µm.
Figure 2. CoT-1 RNA appears highly abundant
Figure 2. CoT-1 RNA appears highly abundant
A) XIST RNA paints interphase X-chromosome territory. Scale…
Figure 2. CoT-1 RNA appears highly abundant A) XIST RNA paints interphase X-chromosome territory. Scale bar 5µm. B) The DAPI dense Barr Body (arrow) defines the inactive X-chromosome painted by XIST RNA. C) Both CoT-1 and XIST RNAs are detected simultaneously with the same fluorochrome. D) Linescan (white line in C) through the Barr body (arrow) illustrates similar intensities for both RNAs (green). E–H) CoT-1 RNA is more abundant than rRNA. All images are the same exposure. E) CoT-1 RNA alone, F) nucleolar 18S rRNA alone (Insert is same cell with DAPI DNA included), G) CoT-1 RNA and 18S rRNA detected with same fluorochrome. H) Average total intensities were measured for each RNA signal (n=40).
Figure 3. CoT-1 RNA localizes to the…
Figure 3. CoT-1 RNA localizes to the chromosome similar to XIST RNA
A) XIST RNA…
Figure 3. CoT-1 RNA localizes to the chromosome similar to XIST RNA A) XIST RNA is strictly localized to the inactive chromosome in interphase. B) Human CoT-1 RNA is also strictly localized to human Chr4 in all interphase hybrid cells. Both RNAs are released at Mitosis (M) (arrows). C–D) Excised introns do not localize to chromatin, and drift away from their transcription sites. Transcription foci denoted by arrows. E) CoT-1 DNA identifies human Chr4 in hybrid cells painted by CoT-1 RNA (channels separated at right). Scale bar 5µm. F) A linescan (white line in E) shows the RNA has a sharp border at the edge of the chromosome territory. G) 3D image of CoT-1 DNA and RNA on human Chr4 in a single hybrid nucleus, with side views. H) same image as G with DAPI DNA removed. I) CoT-1 DNA and RNA signals are colocalized. (See Fig S1 & S2 and Movies S1, S2 & S3).
Figure 4. The majority of RNA associated…
Figure 4. The majority of RNA associated with interphase chromosomes is repeat RNA, which is…
Figure 4. The majority of RNA associated with interphase chromosomes is repeat RNA, which is released at mitosis and resynthesized in G1 A–C) XIST RNA is released at mitosis and re-synthesized in early G1d cells. Scale bar 5µm. D–F) CoT-1 RNA is also released at mitosis and re-synthesized in G1d. G) A Chr4 library probe effectively detects the unique single copy DNA sequences across the chromosome (with CoT-1 competition). H–I) The same Chr4 library probe detects only a weak RNA signal (arrow) over the Chr4 territory (with CoT-1 competition). J–K) More RNA is detected on the Chr4 territory when CoT-1 competition is removed. H–K are taken at the same exposure with standardized fluorescent beads (small round objects in images). (See Fig S2). Beads are 2.5µm.
Figure 5. CoT-1 RNA localization is very…
Figure 5. CoT-1 RNA localization is very stable under transcriptional inhibition
A–B) CoT-1 RNA is…
Figure 5. CoT-1 RNA localization is very stable under transcriptional inhibition A–B) CoT-1 RNA is re-synthesized early in G1d (arrows). C–H) Transcriptional inhibition using three inhibitors (C–H) prevents CoT-1 re-synthesis in 95–100% of G1d cells (arrows), but doesn’t significantly affect CoT-1 RNA levels in 93–95% of interphase cells. I–L) COL1A1 transcription foci are detected in 95% of interphase and G1d cells (arrows). (I–J) COL1A1 RNA foci are eliminated in 82% of cells after 5 hours in DRB, but only G1d cells (arrows) also lack CoT-1 RNA. (See Fig S2 & S3). All scale bars are 5µm.
Figure 6. RNA from the 3’ end…
Figure 6. RNA from the 3’ end of L1 is a large component of the…
Figure 6. RNA from the 3’ end of L1 is a large component of the CoT-1 RNA signal L1 ORF2 RNA signal (A–B) is ~4X brighter than the double stranded L1 ORF2 DNA signal (C–D), while the L1 ORF1 RNA signal (E–F) is ~0.2X the DNA signal (G–H). I) L1 RNA/DNA signals were quantified using digital fluorimetry. J) qPCR confirms L1 ORF2 RNA is ~5–7X more expressed than ORF1 RNA. K) Alu RNA is ~3–4X dimmer than its DNA signal quantified by digital fluorimetry (See Fig S5 & S6).
Figure 7. CoT-1 RNA associates with the…
Figure 7. CoT-1 RNA associates with the nuclear scaffold and Cot-1 RNA loss is coincident…
Figure 7. CoT-1 RNA associates with the nuclear scaffold and Cot-1 RNA loss is coincident with chromatin collapse A) CoT-1 RNA remains bound to human Chr4 in ruptured nuclei. B–C) CoT-1 RNA is localized in control cells, and D–E) remains localized after removal of ~95% of DNA and histones (in 100% of interphase cells). Exposure times are equal for both images. F–G) CoT-1 RNA remains localized in 88% of cells containing wt SAF-A-GFP, while 80% of cells transfected with C280-GFP mutant (H–I) release CoT-1 RNA. Images include neighboring untransfected cells. J–K) Chromatin collapse seen by EM in transcriptionally inhibited G1d cells compared to similarly inhibited interphase cells (L). M) Transcriptionally inhibited interphase cells retain stable CoT-1 RNA, while post-mitotic cells do not. N) Chromatin does not collapse in interphase cells, but more compacted post-mitotic cells were seen in treated (86%) versus control (12%) samples. O–P) Interphase chromatin collapses when unfixed cells are treated with RNase. Scale bars are 5µm except for EM images which are 2µm. All figures (7) See this image and copyright information in PMC
Comment in
Interphase chromatin LINEd with RNA. Nozawa RS, Gilbert N.Nozawa RS, et al.Cell. 2014 Feb 27;156(5):864-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.005.Cell. 2014.PMID: 24581484
Similar articles
Interphase chromatin LINEd with RNA. Nozawa RS, Gilbert N.Nozawa RS, et al.Cell. 2014 Feb 27;156(5):864-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.005.Cell. 2014.PMID: 24581484
Nascent RNA scaffolds contribute to chromosome territory architecture and counter chromatin compaction. Creamer KM, Kolpa HJ, Lawrence JB.Creamer KM, et al.Mol Cell. 2021 Sep 2;81(17):3509-3525.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 27.Mol Cell. 2021.PMID: 34320406Free PMC article.
RNA as a fundamental component of interphase chromosomes: could repeats prove key? Hall LL, Lawrence JB.Hall LL, et al.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Apr;37:137-147. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 21.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016.PMID: 27218204Free PMC article.Review.
XIST RNA paints the inactive X chromosome at interphase: evidence for a novel RNA involved in nuclear/chromosome structure. Clemson CM, McNeil JA, Willard HF, Lawrence JB.Clemson CM, et al.J Cell Biol. 1996 Feb;132(3):259-75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.3.259.J Cell Biol. 1996.PMID: 8636206Free PMC article.
XIST RNA and architecture of the inactive X chromosome: implications for the repeat genome. Hall LL, Lawrence JB.Hall LL, et al.Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:345-56. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.030. Epub 2011 Mar 29.Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010.PMID: 21447818Free PMC article.Review.
See all similar articles
Cited by
A critical role for X-chromosome architecture in mammalian X-chromosome dosage compensation. Dror I, Tan T, Plath K.Dror I, et al.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2024 Aug;87:102235. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2024.102235. Epub 2024 Jul 25.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2024.PMID: 39053028Review.
Non-coding RNA derived from a conservative subtelomeric tandem repeat in chicken and Japanese quail somatic cells. Trofimova I, Popova D, Vasilevskaya E, Krasikova A.Trofimova I, et al.Mol Cytogenet. 2014 Dec 23;7(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13039-014-0102-7. eCollection 2014.Mol Cytogenet. 2014.PMID: 25610495Free PMC article.
Locus-level L1 DNA methylation profiling reveals the epigenetic and transcriptional interplay between L1s and their integration sites. Lanciano S, Philippe C, Sarkar A, Pratella D, Domrane C, Doucet AJ, van Essen D, Saccani S, Ferry L, Defossez PA, Cristofari G.Lanciano S, et al.Cell Genom. 2024 Feb 14;4(2):100498. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100498. Epub 2024 Feb 2.Cell Genom. 2024.PMID: 38309261Free PMC article.
SAF-A mutants disrupt chromatin structure through dominant negative effects on RNAs associated with chromatin. Kolpa HJ, Creamer KM, Hall LL, Lawrence JB.Kolpa HJ, et al.Mamm Genome. 2022 Jun;33(2):366-381. doi: 10.1007/s00335-021-09935-8. Epub 2021 Dec 2.Mamm Genome. 2022.PMID: 34859278Free PMC article.
Variable escape from X-chromosome inactivation: identifying factors that tip the scales towards expression. Peeters SB, Cotton AM, Brown CJ.Peeters SB, et al.Bioessays. 2014 Aug;36(8):746-56. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400032. Epub 2014 Jun 10.Bioessays. 2014.PMID: 24913292Free PMC article.Review.
See all "Cited by" articles
References
Aalto AP, Pasquinelli AE. Small non-coding RNAs mount a silent revolution in gene expression. Current opinion in cell biology. 2012;24:333–340. - PMC - PubMed
Bensaude O. Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: Which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity? Transcription. 2011;2:103–108. - PMC - PubMed
Britten RJ, Kohne DE. Repeated sequences in DNA: Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms. Science. 1968;161:529–540. - PubMed
Bynum JW, Volkin E. Chromatin-associated RNA: differential extraction and characterization. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1980;607:304–318. - PubMed
Chaumeil J, Le Baccon P, Wutz A, Heard E. A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2223–2237. - PMC - PubMed
