The Coty Judgment In A Nutshell - Lexology

 Back Forward

• Save & file
• View original
• Forward
• Print
• Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
• Follow Please login to follow content.
• Like
• Instruct

add to folder:

• My saved (default)
• Read later

Folders shared with you

• 

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register The Coty judgment in a Nutshell Camilleri Preziosi European Union April 23 2018

In its Coty judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) confirmed that suppliers of luxury goods may prohibit their authorised suppliers from selling on a third-party platform in certain circumstances.

This case related to a selective distribution agreement between Coty Germany GmbH (“Coty”), a leading German supplier of luxury cosmetics, and one of its distributors, effectively prohibiting it from distributing Coty’s products on marketplaces such as Amazon. While in the previous Pierre Fabre case (C-439/09) the Court held that, generally speaking, an absolute ban on online sales constitutes a restriction of competition, in Coty it opined that within the specific context of luxury goods a marketplace ban imposed by a supplier in a selective distribution agreement may be excluded from the scope of competition law if it is necessary to preserve the quality and proper use of the products in question.

In the Court’s view, such a practice would provide a supplier with a guarantee that the goods will only be associated with its authorised distributors, enabling it to ensure that they are sold in an environment corresponding to the qualitative conditions agreed upon. The absence of a contractual link between the supplier and third-party platforms would be an obstacle to ensuring compliance with such conditions, with a possible result being the deterioration in online presentation, in turn harming the luxury image of the goods in question. In concluding, the Court held that restricting luxury goods from being sold through platforms which sell goods of all kinds might contribute to that luxury image which constitutes one of the main characteristics sought by consumers.

Case cited: Case C-230/16, Coty Germany GmbH vs Parfümerie Akzente GmbH ECLI:EU:C:2017:941

Camilleri Preziosi - Ron Galea Cavallazzi, Lisa Abela and Katya Gatt  Back Forward

• Save & file
• View original
• Forward
• Print
• Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
• Follow Please login to follow content.
• Like
• Instruct

add to folder:

• My saved (default)
• Read later

Folders shared with you

• 

Filed under

• European Union
• Competition & Antitrust
• Internet & Social Media
• Camilleri Preziosi

Organisations

• CJEU

Courts

• Court of Justice of the European Union

Popular articles from this firm

1. Solvency II: Pleasures yet to come *

2. The Difference between Falsified and Counterfeit Medicines *

3. New EU Prospectus Regulation - revised draft supplementing regulations published *

4. Commission pre-analysis regarding an EU list of 3rd country jurisdictions scoreboard *

5. Equal Treatment and Transparency principles in Public Procurement *

Interested in contributing? Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers. Learn more Lexology data hub News, analysis and research tools covering the regulation and use of data, tech and AI. Explore now

Related practical resources PRO

• How-to guide How-to guide: How to assess competition law risks in an agency agreement (UK)
• How-to guide How-to guide: How to identify and prioritise competition law risk in your organisation (non-dominant and dominant organisations) (UK)
• Checklist Checklist: Responding to an information request from the Competition and Markets Authority (UK)

View all

Related research hubs

• Court of Justice of the European Union
• European Union
• Internet & Social Media
• Competition & Antitrust