PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Tiger T610 vs Helio G85 – what's better? Tiger T610 vs Helio G85
VS
Tiger T610 Helio G85
We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T610 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G85 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Tiger T610
17 Helio G85
18 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Tiger T610
6 Helio G85
7 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Tiger T610
70 Helio G85
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Tiger T610
24 Helio G85
25 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of MediaTek Helio G85
- Higher GPU frequency (~63%)
- Performs 63% better in floating-point computations
- 10% higher CPU clock speed (2000 vs 1820 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 10 score – 262K vs 250K
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Tiger T610
vs Helio G85
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Tiger T610
250277 Helio G85
+5% 262804 | CPU | 86249 | 72399 |
| GPU | 41435 | 41899 |
| Memory | 59358 | 70163 |
| UX | 63235 | 78343 |
| Total score | 250277 | 262804 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [179 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Tiger T610
+1% 418 Helio G85
413 Multi-Core Score Tiger T610
1305 Helio G85
+2% 1332 | Asset compression | 72.2 MB/sec | 75.3 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 36.6 pages/sec | 38.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 49.3 Mpixels/sec | 44.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 22.6 images/sec | 23.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 40.5 Mpixels/sec | 43.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.17 images/sec | 3.05 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 10.8 images/sec | 12.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.01 Mpixels/sec | 1.75 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Tiger T610
760 Helio G85
+50% 1138 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Tiger T610
526 Helio G85
+41% 743 | Graphics test | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 526 | 743 |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | - | 45 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 40 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | - | 21 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 49 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 51 FPS [Medium] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 46 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T610 and Helio G85
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1820 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 614 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 58.9 Gigaflops | 96 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 13.41 Gb/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2160 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | June 2019 | April 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | - | MT6769Z |
| Official page | - | MediaTek Helio G85 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Tiger T610
822 (37%) Helio G85
1401 (63%) Vote Total votes:
2223 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc T606 (8)
2. MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G99
3. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (10)
4. MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (5)
5. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio P22 (1)
7. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc T606 (1)
8. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G85 and Tiger T610, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >