PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Tiger T610 vs Unisoc T606 – what's better? Tiger T610 vs Unisoc T606
VS
Tiger T610 Unisoc T606
We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T610 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Unisoc T606 (Mali-G57 MP1). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Specs
- Comments (1)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Tiger T610
17 Unisoc T606
16 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Tiger T610
6 Unisoc T606
5 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Tiger T610
70 Unisoc T606
71 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Tiger T610
24 Unisoc T606
24 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Unisoc Tiger T610
- Performs 42% better in floating-point computations
- 14% higher CPU clock speed (1820 vs 1600 MHz)
Pros of Unisoc T606
- Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Tiger T610
vs Unisoc T606
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Tiger T610
+2% 250277 Unisoc T606
246197 | CPU | 86249 | 80363 |
| GPU | 41435 | 23190 |
| Memory | 59358 | 79761 |
| UX | 63235 | 62883 |
| Total score | 250277 | 246197 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [95 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Tiger T610
+13% 418 Unisoc T606
371 Multi-Core Score Tiger T610
1305 Unisoc T606
+7% 1391 | Asset compression | 72.2 MB/sec | 68.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 36.6 pages/sec | 39.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 49.3 Mpixels/sec | 49.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 22.6 images/sec | 23.6 images/sec |
| HDR | 40.5 Mpixels/sec | 41.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.17 images/sec | 3.7 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 10.8 images/sec | 13.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.01 Mpixels/sec | 1.99 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Tiger T610
+72% 760 Unisoc T606
441 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Tiger T610
+25% 526 Unisoc T606
420 | Graphics test | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 526 | 420 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T610 and Unisoc T606
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1820 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.1-A |
| L1 cache | - | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 1 MB |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 614 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 1 |
| Shading units | 24 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 58.9 Gigaflops | 41.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | No |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2160 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 | - H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | June 2019 | September 2021 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Official page | - | Unisoc T606 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Tiger T610
494 (45.9%) Unisoc T606
583 (54.1%) Vote Total votes:
1077 Related Comparisons
1. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1)
2. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio P22 (1)
4. Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5. Unisoc T606 vs MediaTek Helio G35 (5)
6. Unisoc T606 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (8)
7. Unisoc T606 vs MediaTek Helio G88
8. Unisoc T606 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (1)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Unisoc T606 and Tiger T610, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! 
Enthiran January 10, 2024 at 05:25 AM The Unisoc Tiger T610 has a heating issue. I suggest getting the T606 instead, if it's within your current budget. +83 Reply Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >