PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Tiger T618 vs Helio P60 – what's better? Tiger T618 vs Helio P60

VS

Tiger T618 Helio P60
We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T618 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Mediatek Helio P60 (Mali-G72 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Tiger T618
19 Helio P60
15 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Tiger T618
7 Helio P60
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Tiger T618
71 Helio P60
70 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Tiger T618
26 Helio P60
22 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Unisoc Tiger T618
- Shows significantly better (up to 51%) AnTuTu 10 score – 281K vs 186K
- Performs 42% better in floating-point computations
- Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Tiger T618
vs Helio P60
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Tiger T618
+51% 281958 Helio P60
186518 | CPU | 95416 | 51132 |
| GPU | 44687 | 24473 |
| Memory | 69837 | 65158 |
| UX | 72018 | 45755 |
| Total score | 281958 | 186518 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [2 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Tiger T618
+57% 469 Helio P60
299 Multi-Core Score Tiger T618
+26% 1456 Helio P60
1155 | Asset compression | 67.7 MB/sec | 71.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 44 pages/sec | 38.6 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 53.8 Mpixels/sec | 45.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 24.3 images/sec | 12.4 images/sec |
| HDR | 40.6 Mpixels/sec | 42.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 3.13 images/sec | 1.91 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 14.3 images/sec | 9.28 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.11 Mpixels/sec | 1.98 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Tiger T618
1041 Helio P60
n/a 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Tiger T618
+48% 738 Helio P60
500 | Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 738 | 500 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T618 and Helio P60
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A734x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 5.5 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 24 | 12 |
| Total shaders | 48 | 36 |
| FLOPS | 81.6 Gigaflops | 57.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | NeuroPilot |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 13.41 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 2160 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 32MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | August 2019 | February 2018 |
| Class | Low end | Mid range |
| Model number | - | MT6771 |
| Official page | Unisoc Tiger T618 official site | Mediatek Helio P60 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Tiger T618
147 (70.3%) Helio P60
62 (29.7%) Vote Total votes:
209 Related Comparisons
1. Mediatek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio P60 and Tiger T618, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >