Vice President's Role In Senate Is Occasionally Critical | Wilson Center
- TopicsOpen/Close
- Featured Topics
- WQ Fall 2024 | Confronting Unprecedented Humanitarian Needs
- Ukraine
- The Hamas-Israel War
- Refugees and Forced Displacement
- Strategic Competition
- Iván Duque Center for Prosperity and Freedom
- Climate & Migration
- Cold War
- Democracy
- Digital Assets
- Geoeconomics
- Energy
- Environment
- Global Governance
- Governance
- History
- International Development
- Maternal Health
- Migration
- Security and Defense
- US Foreign Policy
- Women & Gender
- Featured Topics
- RegionsOpen/Close
- Arctic/Antarctic
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America
- Middle East and North Africa
- North America
- Russia and Eurasia
- ProgramsOpen/Close
- Africa Program
- Canada Institute
- Congressional Relations
- Environmental Change and Security Program
- China Environment Forum
- Maternal Health Initiative
- Global Europe Program
- History and Public Policy Program
- Cold War International History Project
- North Korea International Documentation Project
- Nuclear Proliferation International History Project
- Indo-Pacific Program
- Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy
- Kennan Institute
- Kissinger Institute on China and the United States
- Latin America Program
- Argentina Project
- Brazil Institute
- Mexico Institute
- Middle East Program
- The Islamists
- Middle East Women's Initiative
- The Middle East and North Africa Workforce Development Initiative
- Polar Institute
- Refugee and Forced Displacement Initiative
- Science and Technology Innovation Program
- Serious Games Initiative
- Wahba Institute for Strategic Competition
- Events
- Experts
- Watch & Listen
- Insight & Analysis
- Press Room
- About the Wilson Center
- Careers, Fellowships, and InternshipsOpen/Close
- Jobs
- Wilson Center Fellowship
- China Fellowship
- Foreign Policy Fellowship
- Congressional Technology Labs
- Internships
- Support the Wilson CenterOpen/Close
- 2023 Donors
- 2022 Donors
- 2021 Donors
- Scholars & Alumni
- Diversity & Inclusion
- The Wilson Quarterly
- Digital Archive
- Home
- Insight & Analysis
Texas Democrat John Nance Garner once opined that the vice presidency is "not worth a bucket of warm spit." He was in a position to know, having gone from being Speaker of the House to being vice president under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Though a small-government populist, "Cactus Jack," as he was known, faithfully carried the president's New Deal water up Capitol Hill during FDR's first term. He became disenchanted with Roosevelt's policies and advisers in the second term and announced his own availability for the presidency in 1939, regardless of whether FDR ran again. Roosevelt broke the two-term precedent and handily won the nomination and re-election in 1940 with Henry Wallace as his VP. Garner quietly retired to his native Uvalde, Texas, regretting that he ever had left the Speaker's chair. Garner's colorful metaphor came to mind recently when a foreign diplomat in Washington, D.C., asked two of my colleagues why the vice president of the United States also serves as President of the Senate. They were just as stumped as I was when they later put the question to me. I half-jokingly speculated that the framers had to give the vice president something to do while he waited around for the president to die. In turning to James Madison's notes from the 1787 Constitutional Convention, I found Delegate Roger Sherman of Connecticut confirming my suspicion. A member of the Committee of Eleven that originated the new office, Sherman defended it as follows: "If the vice-President were not to be President of the Senate, he would be without employment." Sherman added that if the Senate elected its own President to preside over the chamber, that Senator's state would be deprived of a vote except when it came to breaking ties (since it was customary for presiding officers to remain neutral in all other instances). The draft that preceded that of the Committee of Eleven had no vice president and instead provided that the Senate elect one of its own to preside over the body and to fill in as president of the nation when a vacancy occurred. So, the alternative of having a vice president exercise both roles solved two problems. It ensured that no Senator would be deprived of his right to vote at all times, nor have to be absent from the chamber while acting as president of the country. Alexander Hamilton, in "Federalist No. 68," pointed out that there was nothing new about the concept of a fallback executive. The 1777 Constitution of New York state created a lieutenant governor to preside over the state Senate and take over as governor in the event of a vacancy. And no one objected to that at the time. Even in pre-revolutionary America, lieutenant governors presided over several colonial legislatures. The role of vice president as the Senate's president could come into sharper focus again in two weeks, when Democrats are expected to gain seats or even control of the chamber. The Constitution provides that the vice president "shall have no vote, unless [the Senators] be equally divided." The smaller the majority's edge, the more likely the vice president will be called upon to break ties. Garner cast only three tie-breaking votes during his eight years as vice president, when Democrats never held fewer than 59 of 96 Senate seats. On the other hand, our first vice president, John Adams, still holds the record with 29 tie-breakers during George Washington's presidency. Adams also actively participated in Senate debates, lecturing Senators like a school marm. (One Senator wrote in his diary, "For forty minutes he harangued us from the chair.") Eventually he was threatened with a motion to silence him. He subsequently confined himself to procedural utterances only when circumstances required it. Adams' tie-breaking votes included preventing the capital from remaining in New York two more years, blocking war with Britain and ensuring that the president have sole authority to fire his Cabinet appointees (without Senate concurrence). No vice president since the beginning of the 20th century has cast more than eight tie-breaking votes. However, Vice President Cheney already has cast seven tie-breakers in his nearly six years in office. It was Cheney's very presence as President of the Senate that gave control of the 50-50 chamber to the Republicans for organizational purposes during those critical first months of the Bush presidency, from Jan. 21 until June 6, 2001 (when control flipped to the Democrats with Sen. Jim Jeffords' resignation from the Republican Conference to become an Independent). During that initial period of Republican control, Cheney cast two tie-breakers on amendments relating to prescription drugs and the marriage penalty tax. Even when Republicans regained control of the Senate in 2003 by a 51-49 margin, Cheney had to cast three tie-breaking votes in that year alone — all on important budget and tax matters. In the current Congress, with Republicans holding a more comfortable 55-45 margin, Cheney has cast just one tie-breaking vote, albeit an important one on the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005. Lest I leave the misimpression that the vice president's only official role is to preside over the Senate and break ties, there is one other duty under the Constitution worth mentioning. The vice president also is charged with counting the electoral votes for president and vice president and announcing the winners. That will be one of Cheney's last official acts in office in January 2009. It is doubtful, though, that Cheney will be viewed by historians as a mere bucket-toting, tie-breaking, electoral vote-counting VP. As we have seen, the office can be as big as the president wants it to be. Don Wolfensberger is director of the Congress Project at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and former staff director of the House Rules Committee. Copyright 2006 © Roll Call Inc. All rights reserved.
Tagged
SeriesExplore More
Browse Insights & AnalysisPreviousNextPublicationUS PoliticsCongress’ Budgeting Would Baffle a MartianBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationCan Senate De-Escalate Partisan Nuke Warfare?By Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsMcConnell’s Lament Stirs Fresh Breeze of HopeBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsCzar Speaker Is Vindicated on Overthrow RulingBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsSenate Leader Reid’s Rule Recalls House Czar Speaker ReedBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationIdeology Isn’t Source of All PartisanshipBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsAre Committed Ideologues Making Governing Impossible?By Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsDon’t Dismiss Bicameral Working Group Out of HandBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationUS PoliticsProcedural Maneuvers Go Nowhere in Twin CrisesBy Donald WolfensbergerPublicationNo Procedure Can Fix This Tumbling House of CardsBy Donald WolfensbergerArticleGetting Back to Legislating, Remarks of Don WolfensbergerBy Donald Wolfensberger on April 22, 2013ArticleUS PoliticsA Brief History of Congressional Reform EffortsBy Donald Wolfensberger on April 22, 2013CloseCloseShareTừ khóa » Vp Senator Seats
-
Vice President Of The United States
-
Seats For Holden Special Vehicles Senator For Sale - EBay
-
VP - Senator - HSV Classics
-
12 Results: New & Used In Vp Senator Seats In Australia - Gumtree
-
23 Results: New & Used In Hsv Senator Seats In Australia - Gumtree
-
Join - Facebook
-
Vice President Of The United States - Wikipedia
-
Senator And Vice President Of The United States: Can Kamala Harris ...
-
Who Controls The Senate In A 50-50 Tie? - 270toWin
-
Composition Of The Senate
-
Surplus: Interior & Trim Genuine Seat Trim Holden HSV Trim