Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT
Blogs
Recent Entries
Best Entries
Best Blogs
Blog List
Search Blogs
volume flow inlet/out (m3/s)
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Register
Blogs
Community
New Posts
Updated Threads
Search
New Today
All Forums
Main CFD Forum
ANSYS - CFX
ANSYS - FLUENT
ANSYS - Meshing
Siemens
OpenFOAM
SU2
Last Week
All Forums
Main CFD Forum
ANSYS - CFX
ANSYS - FLUENT
ANSYS - Meshing
Siemens
OpenFOAM
SU2
Updated Today
All Forums
Main CFD Forum
ANSYS - CFX
ANSYS - FLUENT
ANSYS - Meshing
Siemens
OpenFOAM
SU2
Last Week
All Forums
Main CFD Forum
ANSYS - CFX
ANSYS - FLUENT
ANSYS - Meshing
Siemens
OpenFOAM
SU2
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Search Blogs
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
3Likes
Top
All
This Page
1Post By LuckyTran
2Post By LuckyTran
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
April 4, 2017, 16:46
volume flow inlet/out (m3/s)
#1
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 14
Hello all! I need to simulate a case that I need to specify volume flow out (l/s). I tried pressure outlet and set a negative pressure outlet both with and without target mass flow, but it is difficult to obtain desired volume flow and it needs several try and errors. This is the same for volume flow inlet. Any solution to this? Thanks.
Try with some pressure value and keep on going with valuable changes in previous value. I have also done the same.
April 4, 2017, 22:55
#3
LuckyTran Senior Member Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,691 Rep Power: 66
Use a velocity inlet. Velocity x Area = volumetric flow rate There's no velocity outlet because it generally results in an ill-posed problem. But you can use a velocity inlet with a negative velocity to force an outlet flowrate.
April 4, 2017, 22:57
#4
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 14
This might work for volume flow inlet. What about volume flow outlet?
April 4, 2017, 23:04
#5
LuckyTran Senior Member Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,691 Rep Power: 66
You can use a velocity inlet as an outlet
April 5, 2017, 11:41
#6
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 14
Hello and thanks for your reply. I guess you mean "velocity inlet" with negative sign for the velocity. If so, then no, you cannot! What temperature you will assign then? How do you specify the out flow direction? You have to impose a direction for the velocity (for example perpendicular) which might not be true!
April 5, 2017, 13:16
#7
LuckyTran Senior Member Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,691 Rep Power: 66
That's exactly why there is no velocity outlet option. It's non-physical to begin with. How the hell do you impose a volumetric flowrate at the outlet in the first place? The N-S equations are inherently upwind biased because stuff flows from upstream to downstream. There are an infinite number of solutions that will all satisfy a volumetric outflow BC. Either you accept that you have an ill-posed problem and give up or you live with some assumptions such as assuming an outflow direction and temperature. Otherwise, the problem is stupidly posed. asal likes this.
April 12, 2017, 17:30
#8
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 14
Hello and thanks again for your comment. I totally agree with you. However, what do you suggest in the following case: How to model an exhaust with certation flow rate through? For instance a range hood? You only know the flow rate through the exhaust, but you don't know the temperature and you don't want to impose any direction.
April 12, 2017, 18:00
#9
LuckyTran Senior Member Lucky Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 5,691 Rep Power: 66
I suggest you try solving a real problem. If you do not make an assumption about the exit properties, then there are infinite number of solutions to your problem. For a given volumetric flow rate at the outlet, I can always find an infinite number of velocity and density profiles that satisfy that constraint. There's a doubly infinite set of possible solutions. A range hood has a fan in it. A fan does not fix the volumetric flow rate, it provides mechanical work. The volumetric flow rate depends on the losses in the system (i.e. the pressure upstream and downstream of the fan). Just because you turn on range hood does not mean you get a certain flow rate, the flowrate is whatever it needs to be to satisfy the pressure drop of the system. That is, the system adjusts to the new conditions. That is why, fan curves are specified in volumetric flow rate at a given pressure and temperature, because you need the pressure & temperature to figure out the density and mass-flow. Unless you stuck a probe in the exhaust to measure the velocity profile, you cannot know the flow through the exhaust. asal and attiquejavaid08 like this.
May 14, 2017, 17:55
#10
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 14
thanks again for your reply. I have one more question related to this question. Why we cannot fix this with "Target Mass Flow Rate"? If I calculate the mass flow correspondent to the volume flow and set to the bounday, then it should work, but it don't!! What is the problem?
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version
Display Modes
Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode
Search this Thread
Advanced Search
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012
anand_30
OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion
13
March 7, 2022 17:22
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow
Jing
Main CFD Forum
8
October 5, 2018 17:02
Problem of simulating of small droplet with radius of 2mm
liguifan
OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD
5
June 3, 2014 02:53
[blockMesh] non-orthogonal faces and incorrect orientation?
nennbs
OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion
7
April 17, 2013 05:42
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center
3Likes 
1 Post By LuckyTran 
April 4, 2017, 16:46 
volume flow inlet/out (m3/s) 
Show Printable Version
Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Switch to Threaded Mode
Posting Rules 
Similar Threads 
© CFD Online 
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Digg this Thread!
Add Thread to del.icio.us
Bookmark in Technorati
Tweet this thread